Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

"In the Name of Design": Are We Solving or Creating New Problems?

Authors: Kumar, Tadiboina Samantha;

"In the Name of Design": Are We Solving or Creating New Problems?

Abstract

Abstract: Design thinking become prominent as a methodology for innovation and problem-solving across diverse domains. This research critically examines the unintended consequences that may arise from design interventions, exploring how well-intentioned solutions can inadvertently generate new challenges. Drawing from interdisciplinary perspectives including design theory, ethics, sociology, and systems thinking, this study identifies the complex dynamics at play when implementing design processes in real-world contexts. Practical implications include actionable recommendations for designers, policymakers, and industry leaders to integrate comprehensive impact assessments and adaptive feedback mechanisms into their design practices. These measures aim to anticipate and mitigate potential negative outcomes, promoting responsible and sustainable innovation. Through a synthesis of empirical examples and theoretical frameworks, this research underscores the importance of ethical foresight and stakeholder engagement throughout the design lifecycle. Fostering a culture of reflexivity and continuous learning, it advocates for a balanced approach that leverages creativity while ensuring societal well-being and environmental stewardship. Practical Implications: Ultimately, this study calls for re-evaluating design practices to align innovation with ethical imperatives and long-term sustainability goals.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Multidisciplinary perspective, Impact assessment, Design thinking, Environmental sustainability, Problem-solving., Ethical design, Innovation, Interdisciplinary research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average