
The European Commission co-funds public projects through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) to stimulate the sustainable economic development of EU Member States. The ESIF budget is about 90 billion euros annually and ESIF beneficiaries are explicitly encouraged to increase their use of Green Public Procurement (GPP) since 2014. In this paper, we study to what extent ESIF co-funding affects the uptake of GPP, using a dataset with all public tender notices in the Czech Republic (2006-2019). Our findings suggest that ESIF co-funding instigates selection behaviour by contracting authorities to improve chances of receiving co-funding. After accounting for selection effects, we find that ESIF co-funding has a small but significant effect on the uptake of GPP. Studying exogenous changes in the ESIF policy conditions, we find that GPP uptake responds to changes in the availability of co-funding and not to stronger policy objectives related to sustainability. Finally, we find that the contracting authority’s prior experience with GPP is positively associated with ESIF co-funding and has only a small effect on GPP uptake aside from ESIF.
Economics, Environmental Studies, Social Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, SECTOR, 3801 Applied economics, Policy evaluation, Co-funding, D73, Business & Economics, Sustainable development, green public procurement, SDG 13 - Climate Action, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, 1402 Applied Economics, 1499 Other Economics, Science & Technology, sustainable development, Ecology, ddc:330, H57, 3103 Ecology, co-funding, sustainable developmen, Green public procurement, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, climate policy, policy evaluation, Agricultural Economics & Policy, Climate policy, 3899 Other economics, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, EU, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences
Economics, Environmental Studies, Social Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, SECTOR, 3801 Applied economics, Policy evaluation, Co-funding, D73, Business & Economics, Sustainable development, green public procurement, SDG 13 - Climate Action, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, 1402 Applied Economics, 1499 Other Economics, Science & Technology, sustainable development, Ecology, ddc:330, H57, 3103 Ecology, co-funding, sustainable developmen, Green public procurement, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, climate policy, policy evaluation, Agricultural Economics & Policy, Climate policy, 3899 Other economics, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, EU, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
