Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Advanced Research
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

MANAGEMENT OF URETERIC CALCULI WITH PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY AND INTRACORPOREAL HOLMIUM: YAG LASER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Authors: P. S. Khatana; Jitendra Kumar; Preeti Juneja.;

MANAGEMENT OF URETERIC CALCULI WITH PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY AND INTRACORPOREAL HOLMIUM: YAG LASER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Abstract

Background: Among many lithotripters available for fragmentation of ureteric stones, pneumatic and Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy have reported favorable outcomes. Aim of this study is to compare the intracorporeal Holmium: YAG laser with pneumatic lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation in terms of fragmentation time, stone migration, intra-operative and post-operative complications, stone free rate and need for auxiliary procedures. Material & Methods: Fifty patients selected with diagnosis of calculus in ureter suitable for endoscopic treatment. They were subsequently randomized in to two groups by sealed envelope method. Group 1 was treated with Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy and group 2 with pneumatic lithotripsy. All patients with ureteral calculi of size 6-20 mm were included while stone size >20mm, patients with sign of sepsis, pregnancy, renal insufficiency or urinary tract abnormalities were excluded from the study. Results: Maximum number of cases (64%) were from 21-40 years age group in both the groups, while least number of cases (8% of all) were from age group <20 years in pneumatic (4%) and Holmium group (12%) respectively. At six weeks, only 22 patients were stone free in pneumatic group (88%) while all patients in holmium group (100%) were free of stones. However, difference was not statistically significant (p=0.074). Conclusion: Both Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy and Pneumatic lithotripsy are very safe methods of ureteroscopic stone fragmentation in experienced hands. However, Holmium: YAG laser is more successful in treatment of upper ureteric stones.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ureteric Stones; Lithotripsy; Pneumatic lithotripsy; Holmium: YAG laser; Ureteroscopy.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 8
  • 3
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
8
Green
gold