Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Supplier performance appraisal systems can be an important element for companies. The current evalution system can not to be used to select a potential supplier in a procurement system because it only provide uninvited supplier data but not provide vendor rating results in recommendations to participate in the bidding procurement. This research sets and gets 5 priority level criteria and 20 sub criteria in evaluation PT Krakatau Daya Listrik supplier performance. The Criteria, Sub Criteria and Alternative Supplier Priority analysis with fuzzy AHP method is known that Supplier A has the best achievement with the value of 1.008 compared to Supplier B with value of 0.602 and C pair with value of 0.660. it is recommended to select a pair because it has a good performance in the Daftar Rekanan Terundang (DRT). Evaluation of supplier performance the procurement of material in PT Krakatau Daya Listrik work effectively and efficiently.
Performance Evaluation, Performance Indicators, Procurement Effeciency.
Performance Evaluation, Performance Indicators, Procurement Effeciency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts