Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

KI-basierte Tools beim wissenschaftlichen Schreiben

Mit Studierenden gemeinsam Anwendungen erproben und evaluieren
Authors: Brommer, Sarah; Heimgartner, Stephanie;

KI-basierte Tools beim wissenschaftlichen Schreiben

Abstract

Der Beitrag schildert explorativ Erfahrungen aus zwei Seminaren, in denen Studierende KI-Tools beim wissenschaftlichen Schreiben nutzten, den Einsatz dokumentierten und Vor- und Nachteile des Schreibens mit KI-Tools evaluierten – angefangen von der Literaturrecherche über das Verarbeiten von Literatur und Schreiben des Textes bis zum Überarbeiten. Aus den Erkenntnissen lassen sich Schlüsse für die künftige Entwicklung von Schreibprozessen wie auch für die (hochschulische) Schreibdidaktik ziehen. Ohne breiter angelegter empirischer Forschung vorgreifen zu wollen, schließt der Beitrag mit kurzen Empfehlungen für alle Lehrenden, die KI im Kontext wissenschaftlichen Schreibens in der Hochschullehre einsetzen wollen.

Related Organizations
Keywords

KI-basierte Tools, Schreibprozess, Schreibdidaktik, Künstliche Intelligenz, Literaturrecherche, wissenschaftliches Schreiben

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities