Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ University of Humani...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

BEYOND_WP1_T1.1_Literature review_overview of literature list and Analysis.

Authors: Slesinger, Ian; Dilger, Jana; Kumar, Richa; Vinders, Julie; Rodrigues, Rowena; Simm, Kadri; Zameska, Jay; +9 Authors

BEYOND_WP1_T1.1_Literature review_overview of literature list and Analysis.

Abstract

Data sets for D1.1. The first part of this deliverable is a scoping review of the literature examining 147 articles published in peer review academic journals over the past ten years (2013-2023) on the promotion of research ethics and integrity (REI), and breaches of these standards including research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRPs). It also identifies current challenges, gaps in knowledge and practice, and opportunities for both further research, and policy and educational interventions to promote REI and mitigate RM and QRPs. Findings on state-of-the-art knowledge in REI research suggest some areas of consensus, including on the greater risks for early career researchers to commit RM and the value of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training, particularly approaches that emphasize ethical problem-solving skills. However, the study also identified a lack of consensus in other areas, including the rehabilitation and reintegration of researchers who committed RM. Key findings extracted from the review contribute to the understanding that the environment in which researchers operate and other contextual factors significantly influence RCR, rather than primarily the individual behavior of researchers. As such, these environmental and contextual factors require further research and policy attention.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average