
With the evolution of 3D tools, there is now plenty of 3D data for digital applications. This includes 3D retrieval, which seeks to manage such data across varied representations like point clouds, meshes, and multi-view images. However, efficiently utilizing these representations for retrieval poses a challenge. This paper evaluates different representations of each modality in uni-modal retrieval and explores optimal combinations for multimodal retrieval. Results indicate MuseHash's superiority in MAP metric, while CMCL excels in recall. This study expands existing research by providing insights into optimal representations and combinations for 3D retrieval.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
