Downloads provided by UsageCounts
These are the guidelines for the ERRATAS project for charting editorial interference in edited collections of English historical correspondence. This checklist is to be used when going through the corpus texts and source editions of CEEC-400 collections, and feeding information into the ERRATAS database in MS Access. This document contains information on the various features to be charted, on what kind of information is to be recorded, and on the data type of this information. The checklist below also contains audit word lists – that is, lists of words exhibiting the feature in question, which can be used to query the corpus collections to see what the editor has done with that feature. UPDATE 14.4.2023: A final version of this checklist has been released. It is included in the bundle of the latest upload of the ERRATAS database of editorial principles and practices in printed editions of historical correspondence. This document has now been superseded, but it still applies to the earlier release of the ERRATAS database.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts