Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Dataset for: Deep learning and infrared thermography for asphalt pavement crack severity classification

Authors: Liu, Fangyu; Liu, Jian; Wang, Linbing;

Dataset for: Deep learning and infrared thermography for asphalt pavement crack severity classification

Abstract

Deep learning, especially convolutional neural network (CNN), is becoming a popular and powerful tool for crack detection. This work aims to apply deep learning and infrared thermography for asphalt pavement crack severity classification. A dataset of asphalt pavement crack was built in this work, including four levels of crack severity, no crack, low-severity crack (i.e., low crack), medium-severity crack (i.e., medium crack), and high-severity crack (i.e., high crack). This dataset had three types of images, the visible image, infrared image, and the fusion of visible and infrared images (i.e., fusion image). Thirteen typical CNN models were trained and evaluated on the aforementioned dataset for deep learning from scratch, while eight pre-trained CNN models trained by ImageNet were also trained and evaluated for transfer learning. This work investigated the effects of image types on the accuracy of deep learning from scratch and transfer learning, as well as the effects of image types on classifying the levels of crack severity. The results show that the CNN models had the highest accuracy on the fusion image for deep learning from scratch, but the highest accuracy on the visible image for transfer learning. The CNN models performed well on both the no crack and low crack but had different performances on the medium crack and high crack for all three types of images, while misclassification occurred mainly on the medium crack and high crack for all three types of images. EfficientNet-B3 had the highest accuracy on all three types of images for both deep learning from scratch and transfer learning.

This is the dataset for the following paper: Fangyu Liu, Jian Liu, and Linbing Wang. "Deep learning and infrared thermography for asphalt pavement crack severity classification." Automation in Construction 140 (2022): 104383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104383. Data component: 01-Visible images: this folder includes fully visible images 02-Infrared images: this folder includes fully infrared images 03-Fusion(50IRT) images: this folder includes fusion images (50% infrared + 50% visible) 04-Ground truth: this folder includes ground truth (txt files): 00-Label_meaning.txt: the meaning of label number 01-All_label.txt: Image, label (severity level) 02-Train_label.txt: the training set: Image, Label (severity level) 02-Test_label.txt: the test set: Image, Label (severity level)

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average