Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes in Term Singleton Malpresentations: A Prospective Analysis

Authors: Pramoda Kumar Sahoo; Manas Ranjan Beher; Deepa Sethy; K B subudhi;

Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes in Term Singleton Malpresentations: A Prospective Analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Malpresentations in obstetrics refer to any fetal presentation other than vertex, including breech,shoulder, face, brow, and compound. The management of malpresentation remains controversial, and there is aneed to evaluate obstetric outcomes in term singleton malpresentation to optimize perinatal outcomes whilepreserving the art of conducting vaginal breech deliveries.Methods: The study was a prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics &Gynaecology at MKCG Medical College & Hospital, Berhampur, from October 2015 to September 2017. Thestudy included 276 term singleton malpresentations out of 17,997 deliveries during the two-year study period,with an incidence of 1.6%. Data on obstetric outcomes, including perinatal mortality, stillbirth, neonatal death,and APGAR scores, were collected and analysed. The study compared outcomes between vaginal deliveries andcesarean section deliveries, focusing on the risks of low APGAR scores and soft tissue damage in differentmalpresentations.Results: The study analyzed 276 term singleton malpresentations, with breech presentations being the mostcommon (81.1%). Most cases were delivered via cesarean section (69.6%), with emergency cesarean sectionsaccounting for 43.2%. In vaginal deliveries, breech presentations were the most common (91.6%). The perinatalmortality rate was 11.9%, with stillbirth and neonatal death accounting for 9.4% and 2.6%, respectively. Vaginaldeliveries had a higher risk of low APGAR scores, with compelling indications being the largest factorcontributing to perinatal mortality.Conclusion: The present study revealed that most malpresentation cases are cesarean, with breech presentationsbeing the most common. Vaginal deliveries in term breech malpresentations have a higher risk of low APGARscores, with brow and shoulder presentations having the highest rates.

AbstractBackground: Malpresentations in obstetrics refer to any fetal presentation other than vertex, including breech,shoulder, face, brow, and compound. The management of malpresentation remains controversial, and there is aneed to evaluate obstetric outcomes in term singleton malpresentation to optimize perinatal outcomes whilepreserving the art of conducting vaginal breech deliveries.Methods: The study was a prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics &Gynaecology at MKCG Medical College & Hospital, Berhampur, from October 2015 to September 2017. Thestudy included 276 term singleton malpresentations out of 17,997 deliveries during the two-year study period,with an incidence of 1.6%. Data on obstetric outcomes, including perinatal mortality, stillbirth, neonatal death,and APGAR scores, were collected and analysed. The study compared outcomes between vaginal deliveries andcesarean section deliveries, focusing on the risks of low APGAR scores and soft tissue damage in differentmalpresentations.Results: The study analyzed 276 term singleton malpresentations, with breech presentations being the mostcommon (81.1%). Most cases were delivered via cesarean section (69.6%), with emergency cesarean sectionsaccounting for 43.2%. In vaginal deliveries, breech presentations were the most common (91.6%). The perinatalmortality rate was 11.9%, with stillbirth and neonatal death accounting for 9.4% and 2.6%, respectively. Vaginaldeliveries had a higher risk of low APGAR scores, with compelling indications being the largest factorcontributing to perinatal mortality.Conclusion: The present study revealed that most malpresentation cases are cesarean, with breech presentationsbeing the most common. Vaginal deliveries in term breech malpresentations have a higher risk of low APGARscores, with brow and shoulder presentations having the highest rates.

Keywords

Term singleton malpresentations, APGAR scores, Vaginal deliveries, Cesarean section deliveries, Obstetric outcomes, Perinatal outcomes, Term Singleton Malpresentations, APGAR scores, Vaginal Deliveries, Cesarean Section Deliveries, Obstetric Outcomes, Perinatal Outcomes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities