Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Patients on Antihypertensive Medication in Southern Rajasthan Population

Authors: Chandra Prakash Purohit; Harish Chandra Sanadhya;

Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Patients on Antihypertensive Medication in Southern Rajasthan Population

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate medication adherence in hypertensive patients. Method and Materials: Participants in this observational, cross-sectional study had hypertension for the previous year and were treated in the Department of Medicine Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur. Hypertensive outpatients under the age of 18 were the focus of the study. A method known as systemic sampling was used to find people to participate. A definite history, careful clinical assessment, and guiding for way of life changes was finished on all members selected. Patients were given the WHO-QOL Bref and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) questionnaires to fill out in a separate room. Results: 152 patients participated in the study, with a mean MMAS-8 Score of 4.88±1.10 and a mean number of medications taken per person of 1.680.79. Seventy-four percent of patients were taking a combination of medications. Group 1 (on a single medication) and Group 2 (on two or more medications) were the two groups of participants. Better quality of life and significantly higher MMAS-8 scores were found in Group 1. Conclusion: Compared to patients on more than two medications, those on a single medication had significantly better adherence, slightly better quality of life, and better adherence correlation.

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate medication adherence in hypertensive patients. Method and Materials: Participants in this observational, cross-sectional study had hypertension for the previous year and were treated in the Department of Medicine Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur. Hypertensive outpatients under the age of 18 were the focus of the study. A method known as systemic sampling was used to find people to participate. A definite history, careful clinical assessment, and guiding for way of life changes was finished on all members selected. Patients were given the WHO-QOL Bref and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) questionnaires to fill out in a separate room. Results: 152 patients participated in the study, with a mean MMAS-8 Score of 4.88±1.10 and a mean number of medications taken per person of 1.680.79. Seventy-four percent of patients were taking a combination of medications. Group 1 (on a single medication) and Group 2 (on two or more medications) were the two groups of participants. Better quality of life and significantly higher MMAS-8 scores were found in Group 1. Conclusion: Compared to patients on more than two medications, those on a single medication had significantly better adherence, slightly better quality of life, and better adherence correlation.

Keywords

Hypertension, Quality of Life, anti-hypertensive Medication.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green