Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An Observational Study to Determine the Importance of OesophagoGastroscopy in the Diagnostics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR)

Authors: Asif Iqbal; Namira Azmi; Praveer Prakash;

An Observational Study to Determine the Importance of OesophagoGastroscopy in the Diagnostics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR)

Abstract

AbstractAim: The aim of the present study was to determine the importance of oesophago-gastroscopy in the diagnosticsof laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) induced pathology.Methods: The present study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, A total of 50 patients (30women, 20 men) with laryngopharyngeal problems in whom GERD was suspected were included in the study.They were 17 −/78 years old, with a mean of 45 years and a standard deviation of 14.6 years.Results: The VHI results showed that patients with vocal fold polyps assessed their voice problems as beingworse in comparison to the voice problems of the LPR patients, but the significant difference appeared only in thephysical subtest of VHI. The subjective VHI test performed in the LPR patients after the treatment showed asignificant improvement in the overall results and in the results of all the subtests in comparison to the results ofthe test performed before the treatment. The acoustic analysis of the voice samples detected almost no change inF0 and JIT and a statistically significant improvement in SH and NHR. On the basis of videoendolaryngoscopy,the lesions of the laryngeal mucosa were evaluated using the BRFS before and after the treatment withesomeprasol. In all the LPR patients the BRFS was more than 7 before the treatment, indicating LPR. After thetreatment, the BRFS significantly decreased.Conclusion: LPR can cause serious voice disorders, globus pharyngeus sensation, or frequent coughing. Thevoice problems can be compared to the problems of patients with vocal fold polyps. Oesophago-gastroscopysupplemented with a biopsy of the oesophageal mucosa can be a suitable method to prove the occurrence of GER.Videoendolaryngoscopy and the BRFS are superior in the diagnostics of LPR and correlate very well with thehistological findings of the oesophageal mucosa specimens. The combination of all three procedures is supposedto be a very successful method in the diagnostics of GERD and especially LPR. Esomeprasol proved to be veryeffective in the treatment of LPR. 

AbstractAim: The aim of the present study was to determine the importance of oesophago-gastroscopy in the diagnosticsof laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) induced pathology.Methods: The present study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, A total of 50 patients (30women, 20 men) with laryngopharyngeal problems in whom GERD was suspected were included in the study.They were 17 −/78 years old, with a mean of 45 years and a standard deviation of 14.6 years.Results: The VHI results showed that patients with vocal fold polyps assessed their voice problems as beingworse in comparison to the voice problems of the LPR patients, but the significant difference appeared only in thephysical subtest of VHI. The subjective VHI test performed in the LPR patients after the treatment showed asignificant improvement in the overall results and in the results of all the subtests in comparison to the results ofthe test performed before the treatment. The acoustic analysis of the voice samples detected almost no change inF0 and JIT and a statistically significant improvement in SH and NHR. On the basis of videoendolaryngoscopy,the lesions of the laryngeal mucosa were evaluated using the BRFS before and after the treatment withesomeprasol. In all the LPR patients the BRFS was more than 7 before the treatment, indicating LPR. After thetreatment, the BRFS significantly decreased.Conclusion: LPR can cause serious voice disorders, globus pharyngeus sensation, or frequent coughing. Thevoice problems can be compared to the problems of patients with vocal fold polyps. Oesophago-gastroscopysupplemented with a biopsy of the oesophageal mucosa can be a suitable method to prove the occurrence of GER.Videoendolaryngoscopy and the BRFS are superior in the diagnostics of LPR and correlate very well with thehistological findings of the oesophageal mucosa specimens. The combination of all three procedures is supposedto be a very successful method in the diagnostics of GERD and especially LPR. Esomeprasol proved to be veryeffective in the treatment of LPR. 

Keywords

laryngopharyngeal reflux, oesophago-gastroscopy, proton-pump inhibitor, videoendolaryngoscopy, vocal fold polyps, voice handicap index

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities