Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Figure 9 in Interference and management of herbicide-resistant crop volunteers

appsOther research productkeyboard_double_arrow_right Image 22 Jan 2021Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Jhala, Amit J.; Beckie, Hugh J.; Peters, Thomas J.; Culpepper, A. Stanley; Norsworthy, Jason K.;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11553397 , 10.5281/zenodo.11553396

Figure 9 in Interference and management of herbicide-resistant crop volunteers

Abstract

Published as part of Jhala, Amit J., Beckie, Hugh J., Peters, Thomas J., Culpepper, A. Stanley & Norsworthy, Jason K., 2021, Interference and management of herbicide-resistant crop volunteers, pp. 257-273 in Weed Science (Cambridge, England) 69 (3) on page 268, DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2021.3, http://zenodo.org/record/11553377

Figure 9. Field-scale evaluation of imidazolinone-resistant (ClearfieldṜ) wheat compared with non–herbicide resistant wheat (including volunteers the following year) in Saskatchewan, Canada, in the early 2000s (adapted from Beckie et al. 2011).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average