
The benefits of making data available for reuse are recognized by many. While some datasets can be openly available, others contain sensitive data that needs to be protected. Many trustworthy digital repositories (TDRs) therefore provide options to publish restricted access. To optimally facilitate reuse, detailed, standardised information about access procedures and requirements should be available. Currently, however, such information is often lacking from datasets metadata, making it difficult to assess if someone is eligible to reuse data and under what conditions. To investigate which access conditions are commonly applied within the Dutch Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research community, the Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations (ODISSEI) and DANS, the Dutch national centre of expertise and repository for research data, conducted a survey. In this paper, we present the survey results which can provide input to identify common conditions that should be included in a future standardisation effort. We conclude with a set of recommendations and next steps, hoping to inspire a broader commitment towards adopting a structured and standardised description of data access conditions.
open access, FAIR data, IDCC25, Access Conditions, research, Legal and ethical issues: Trusting individuals to have power over their own data and its (re)use, sensitive data, Curation infrastructure: Innovative research and exploration into new curation methods, Data reuse, Legal and ethical issues: Sharing health and sharing genomic data, Restricted Access, Accessibillity, Working with challenging data: Sensitive data, retrieval and secure curation, Curation infrastructure: Movements in Open and Citizen Science and trust in digital curation, Legal and ethical issues: Privacy, open science, Papers, Access restrictions, Sensitive data, Data Reuse, research data management, open research, Curation infrastructure: Tools, systems and services that are in development, restricted access data, Access conditions
open access, FAIR data, IDCC25, Access Conditions, research, Legal and ethical issues: Trusting individuals to have power over their own data and its (re)use, sensitive data, Curation infrastructure: Innovative research and exploration into new curation methods, Data reuse, Legal and ethical issues: Sharing health and sharing genomic data, Restricted Access, Accessibillity, Working with challenging data: Sensitive data, retrieval and secure curation, Curation infrastructure: Movements in Open and Citizen Science and trust in digital curation, Legal and ethical issues: Privacy, open science, Papers, Access restrictions, Sensitive data, Data Reuse, research data management, open research, Curation infrastructure: Tools, systems and services that are in development, restricted access data, Access conditions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
