
Ambidextrous grasp data collected incrementally over the course of three months using a dual arm Yumi robot with parallel gripper and suction cup. Equipment used during the data collection:- Yumi IRB-14000s, dual arm robot with suction cup and parallel gripper end-effectors- Phoxi depth camera Annotation is done automatically by comparing the side bin images before and after the grasp is executed. Outliers approximated percentage is in the range 1~2% Low quality samples fall in the range 5~10% Label index name notes [0:3] Grasp center point (x,y,z) [3] Score (Ground truth) one for success and zero for failure [4] Using the parallel gripper head One if parallel gripper head is used to execute the grasp [5:21] [4*4] grasp pose transformation matrix Only when parallel gripper is used [21] Opening width [22] Approach distance [23] Using the suction head One if suction head is used to execute the grasp [24:27] Estimated normal direction The approach direction for the suction head
Point cloud, Parallel gripper, Grasp configuration, Suction cup, Dual arm robot, Ambidextrous Grasp
Point cloud, Parallel gripper, Grasp configuration, Suction cup, Dual arm robot, Ambidextrous Grasp
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
