Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Inference of Wildfire Causes from Their Physical, Biological, Social and Management Attributes

Authors: Pourmohamad, Yavar;

Inference of Wildfire Causes from Their Physical, Biological, Social and Management Attributes

Abstract

Wildfire disasters have increased markedly in the western US (WUS) in the past several decades. Prevention of human-started wildfires, which account for >60% of all ignitions in WUS, is one of the most effective ways of reducing wildfire risk. Wildfire prevention strategies, however, are specific to ignition type, and an increasing number of wildfires (>50%) have been recorded with a missing/unknown ignition cause in recent years. Here, we leverage the spatial and temporal characteristics of wildfire incidents, captured through a cohort of biological, physical, social and management attributes, to infer the possible ignition source for 150,247 wildfires from 1992-2020 in WUS with a missing/unknown ignition cause. Each ignition cause is associated with specific attributes, for example lightning-started fires generally start at higher elevations and lower vegetation greenness, whereas power-started wildfires mainly occur during dry-hot-windy weather. Trained on wildfires with known causes, our model achieves >70% accuracy in determining specific wildfire causes among a cohort of 12 for test data. If only natural versus human-started wildfires are of concern, our model exceeds 93% overall accuracy. Across WUS, global human modification index, elevation, discovery day of year, fire year, and temperature at the day of ignition were the most important features that helped determine the causes of wildfires. Lower weights assigned to weather is because all wildfires start during “dry-hot enough” weather. Models developed for individual states in WUS show overall accuracies ranging from 60% (California) to 81% (Nevada), with markedly different feature importances.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average