Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis: A Comparative Study Microdebrider Assisted Fess V/S Conventional Fess
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis: A Comparative Study Microdebrider Assisted Fess V/S Conventional Fess
Objective: To study & compare the benefits of microdebrider- assisted FESS VS conventional FESS in terms of subjective as well as objective improvement in symptoms of nasal polyposis. Material & Methods: This study involves total 150 patients with bilateral nasal polyp scheduled to undergo FESS. The patients were randomized into two groups: Group A- Conventional FESS and Group B- Microdebrider-assisted FESS. Results: In our Study male found to be predominant with age distribution of the patients ranged from 13 to 50 years. Conclusion: we can achieve good postoperative results in both groups provided a well skilled & trained surgeon with proper anatomical knowledge, good instruments, hypotensive anaesthesia, minimal mucosal trauma & regular follow up.
Objective: To study & compare the benefits of microdebrider- assisted FESS VS conventional FESS in terms of subjective as well as objective improvement in symptoms of nasal polyposis. Material & Methods: This study involves total 150 patients with bilateral nasal polyp scheduled to undergo FESS. The patients were randomized into two groups: Group A- Conventional FESS and Group B- Microdebrider-assisted FESS. Results: In our Study male found to be predominant with age distribution of the patients ranged from 13 to 50 years. Conclusion: we can achieve good postoperative results in both groups provided a well skilled & trained surgeon with proper anatomical knowledge, good instruments, hypotensive anaesthesia, minimal mucosal trauma & regular follow up.
DNE (Diagnostic nasal endoscopy), Functional sinus endoscopic surgery (FESS), Computed Tomography (CT- scan)
DNE (Diagnostic nasal endoscopy), Functional sinus endoscopic surgery (FESS), Computed Tomography (CT- scan)
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!