Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This report describes the organization, discussion topics, and outcomes of a two-day workshop for US-based early career faculty researchers and researchers working in the area of combustion and fire, held in April 2017 in College Park, Maryland, USA. Using an unconference format, the 38 participants discussed issues facing the field clustered into two thrusts: cultural and technical. The discussion topics included attracting and retaining a more diverse community, public engagement, improving educational outcomes, hostile and confrontational climate, publishing (open data, open access, open software), collaboration, what does “combustion science” encompass?, and balancing fundamental and applied research. We make recommendations to the community to address each of the issues, summarize progress made to date, and describe plans for future activities. We also discuss some changes made in the community since the workshop. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the U.S. government or the authors’ employers. Furthermore, this report only serves to document the discussions and recommendations made by the US-based workshop participants, so it necessarily reflects their views. It does not seek to fully review all efforts by the combustion community or associated professional society, The Combustion Institute.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant CBET-1733968.
workshop, early career researchers, fire, combustion
workshop, early career researchers, fire, combustion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts