
A team involved in the Generations and Gender Programme tested F-UJI, FDMM and SHARC to assess the FAIRness of their longitudinal panel survey dataset. "We tried a tool, F-UJI, and two methods: FDMM and SHARC. Using the F-UJI tool, we initially obtained a very low level of FAIRness (4%). We hypothesized three possible reasons for this low score: the F-UJI tool's sensitivity to the software we use to develop our catalogue (Colectica), the lack of persistent identifiers such as DOI for our datasets and metadata files, and the type of DDI version we use (DDI version 3.3)." ---------- Supported applicant: Arianna Caporali | French Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) and Generations and Gender Programme (GGP), Olga Grünwald | Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Generations and Gender Programme (GGP) FAIR-IMPACT Support: Clara Linés | Digital Curation Centre (DCC)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
