Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Open Science + Accessibility = A Winning Formula

Authors: Ferguson, Kim;

Open Science + Accessibility = A Winning Formula

Abstract

Delivered at SURF Research Day 2024 in Amersfoort (NL) on May 30th, 2024. Abstract The term "accessibility" ('toegankelijkheid' in Dutch) is a largely context-dependent. For instance, when used within research, it often refers to the FAIR Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Meanwhile, in the fields of web design, education, and law, "accessibility" primarily refers to design for people with disabilities. Several international, European, and Dutch regulations address and refer to accessibility in this second definition directly in a variety of societal aspects, which may be surprising if you've not come across it until now. When it comes to improving accessibility of research, we can ask some "why's" and "how's". Why make things more accessible? By ensuring the excellence and societal relevance of our research requires a continuous commitment to understanding and enhancing accessibility at every stage of the research life cycle. Furthermore, improving accessibility in research environments, within all levels, will empower disabled researchers, students, and support staff to excel while also guaranteeing that our findings reach the broadest audience, a key element of open science. How do we figure out how accessible our work is? How do we improve it? In this interactive session, we will discuss together the importance of accessibility throughout the research life cycle and share essential resources that you can use to assess and improve the accessibility of your scholarly work. Some topics that will be covered include research software, publications, education, and citizen science initiatives. Note: The slide deck is distributed the same across three file formats: .pptx, .odp, and .pdf. The .pptx format is the most (web) accessible while the .odp format is the most open without retaining several accessibility features - both formats are subject to formatting issues. The .pdf serves as a stable visual version with accessible features. In case of format issues, the .pdf file would be considered the reference file - this reference file is denoted by "1-" at the beginning of the file name.

Keywords

Web accessibility, open science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities