Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Recent Trends and Advances in Pain Management for Male Circumcision in Pediatric Population: Systematic Review

Authors: Kalpesh Onkar Patil; Vinod Kumar; Megha Sonawane;

Recent Trends and Advances in Pain Management for Male Circumcision in Pediatric Population: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: Circumcision is one of the oldest and most frequently performed surgical procedures done on males by pediatric surgeons. Pain management is one of the challenging tasks for both pediatric surgeons and anesthesiologists involved during the procedure of male circumcision. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the researchers conducted on pain management in pediatric male circumcision published during the past ten years. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The literature search encompassed an extensive database including PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct and Embase. Studies published after the year 2012 were included in the analysis. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools tailored to the study design. The synthesis and analysis of data included a narrative summary of study characteristics, analgesic methods, pain scale used, surgical technique, and main study results. Results: Sample sizes in the selected studies ranged from 40 to over 1300 participants. Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) was the most commonly performed regional anesthetic technique for male circumcision. Plastibell technique was the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the study. Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was the most commonly used pain scale in the present findings. Conclusion: In summary, the management of pain during and after male circumcision in the pediatric population has seen remarkable progress, reflecting a commitment to delivering safe, effective, and pain-free care to new-borns and infants.

Background: Circumcision is one of the oldest and most frequently performed surgical procedures done on males by pediatric surgeons. Pain management is one of the challenging tasks for both pediatric surgeons and anesthesiologists involved during the procedure of male circumcision. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the researchers conducted on pain management in pediatric male circumcision published during the past ten years. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The literature search encompassed an extensive database including PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct and Embase. Studies published after the year 2012 were included in the analysis. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools tailored to the study design. The synthesis and analysis of data included a narrative summary of study characteristics, analgesic methods, pain scale used, surgical technique, and main study results. Results: Sample sizes in the selected studies ranged from 40 to over 1300 participants. Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) was the most commonly performed regional anesthetic technique for male circumcision. Plastibell technique was the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the study. Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was the most commonly used pain scale in the present findings. Conclusion: In summary, the management of pain during and after male circumcision in the pediatric population has seen remarkable progress, reflecting a commitment to delivering safe, effective, and pain-free care to new-borns and infants.

Keywords

Male circumcision, pediatric population, pain, newborn, pain management, anesthesia, analgesia.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities