Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Isolation and Identification of Fungi from Patients Suffering from Superficial Skin Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Pandey GK; Kamath N; Babariya M J; , Bin Najeeb MA; Saharan K;

Isolation and Identification of Fungi from Patients Suffering from Superficial Skin Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are often seen in day-to-day clinical practice, and their prevalencecontinues to rise worldwide. The present study attempts to find out the distribution of superficial fungal infectionwith respect to socio-economic and demographic variables among a symptomatic group.Objective: The present study was undertaken with a view to isolate the fungi from patients suffering fromsuperficial skin infection attending Dermatology OPD at NAMO Medical Education & Research InstituteSilvassa, DNH and to assess the clinical profile, prevalence of dermatophytes infection in study population.Methods: A clinical and mycological study of superficial mycosis was conducted on 100 cases (65 male & 35female). Direct microscopy by KOH mount and culture was undertaken to isolate the fungal pathogen in eachcase. Further, LPCB mount was performed for microscopic morphology.Result: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Dermatophytosis was the commonest superficialfungal infection in 47 cases), followed by Candidiasis in 8 (14.5%) cases. Commonest clinical presentation wasT. corporis in 32 (39%), followed by T. cruris in 27 (33%) cases. The commonest dermatophyte cultured was T.mentagrophyte in 22 (22%) followed by T. rubrum in 15 (14.9%) cases. Non Dermatophytic Molds (NDM) wereisolated in 3/55 (5.4%) cases. The commonest NDM isolated was Exophiala.Conclusion: We conclude that along with dermatophytes, non dermatophytic fungus are also emerging asimportant cause of superficial mycosis. Direct microscopy and culture both are important tools for diagnosis offungal infections.

Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are often seen in day-to-day clinical practice, and their prevalencecontinues to rise worldwide. The present study attempts to find out the distribution of superficial fungal infectionwith respect to socio-economic and demographic variables among a symptomatic group.Objective: The present study was undertaken with a view to isolate the fungi from patients suffering fromsuperficial skin infection attending Dermatology OPD at NAMO Medical Education & Research InstituteSilvassa, DNH and to assess the clinical profile, prevalence of dermatophytes infection in study population.Methods: A clinical and mycological study of superficial mycosis was conducted on 100 cases (65 male & 35female). Direct microscopy by KOH mount and culture was undertaken to isolate the fungal pathogen in eachcase. Further, LPCB mount was performed for microscopic morphology.Result: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Dermatophytosis was the commonest superficialfungal infection in 47 cases), followed by Candidiasis in 8 (14.5%) cases. Commonest clinical presentation wasT. corporis in 32 (39%), followed by T. cruris in 27 (33%) cases. The commonest dermatophyte cultured was T.mentagrophyte in 22 (22%) followed by T. rubrum in 15 (14.9%) cases. Non Dermatophytic Molds (NDM) wereisolated in 3/55 (5.4%) cases. The commonest NDM isolated was Exophiala.Conclusion: We conclude that along with dermatophytes, non dermatophytic fungus are also emerging asimportant cause of superficial mycosis. Direct microscopy and culture both are important tools for diagnosis offungal infections.

Keywords

Dermatophytosis, Dermatophytes, T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities