
The International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF) has become a widely accepted standard for the digital delivery of digital visual art and historical documents. Unfortunately, however, practice shows that the standard has some serious shortcomings that make it difficult to use in the field of art and culture. I will highlight these shortcomings and show how they could be addressed using the example of an open source IIIF-compliant high-performance image server (SIPI) developed for the Data and Service Center for the Humanities (DaSCH).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
