
Conventional research practice tends to focus on research articles and withhold the procedural documents, supporting datasets, and other relevant materials generated during the research process. However, the limitations of this approach have become increasingly apparent due to phenomena such as 'publish or perish,' the reproducibility crisis, and instances of academic fraud. In response, the research community is advocating for greater accountability, transparency, and openness. This call is being met by various initiatives across disciplinary domains, all aimed at making research data and supporting resources FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. In this guide, we outline steps researchers can take to share all their research outputs with PIDs and metadata to make their research process and practices FAIR.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
