Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Harmonizing variables is an important part of research in the social sciences as it maximizes the value of existing research data by enhancing the secondary reuse value of the datasets. However, to be of wide-spread scientific value to the community, the harmonisation process must be documented and published in precise and transparent ways, so as to be both replicable and citable. GESIS solution to this challenge was to draw on DDI metadata structuring when developing our line of "CharmStats" harmonization tools. CharmStats processes metadata informed by the structure DDI uses for variable-, question- and study level information. Our poster maps the types of input flows, including DDI, into the CharmStats system, displays the types of outputs generated by CharmStats and which data formats are used while importing and exporting.
DDI
DDI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts