Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Outcomes and Complications of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Systematic Analysis of the Success Rates, Functional Outcomes, and Potential Complications Associated with Arthroscopic Meniscectomy for Meniscus Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors: Nitin Kumar; Govind Mohan Jee;

Outcomes and Complications of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Systematic Analysis of the Success Rates, Functional Outcomes, and Potential Complications Associated with Arthroscopic Meniscectomy for Meniscus Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: For meniscus injuries, arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery is frequently used. Its therapeutic utility has been established, but more extensive real-world evidence is needed to confirm its pain-relieving and joint-improving efficacy. Methods: About 25 patients with verified meniscus tears were included in this retrospective cohort analysis, in which we analysed the results and complications of arthroscopic meniscectomy. Data on patients’ demographics, preoperative symptoms, surgical procedures, intraoperative results, and aftercare were compiled and analysed. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to evaluate the success rates regarding pain reduction and improved joint function, functional recovery, and complications. Results: High rates of success after arthroscopic meniscectomy were found in the study, which is encouraging. Eighty-five per cent of patients reported decreased pain, and 78 per cent said enhanced joint mobility. And 70% of people returned to doing all they did before their injuries. Average KOOS scores rose by 24 points. Postoperative pain was reported in 10% of patients, minor joint stiffness in 7.2%, and one occurrence of more profound vein thrombosis in 0.4%. Conclusion: Clinical evidence supports the use of arthroscopic meniscectomy to treat meniscus tears, which results in decreased discomfort and enhanced joint function. These results indicate that it should be used indefinitely as a therapeutic measure. Complications highlight the significance of cautious selection of patients and surgical procedures. This study adds to the body of evidence from real-world settings, supporting the clinical efficacy of the technique while also stressing the need for continuous research to improve patient outcomes further.

Background: For meniscus injuries, arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery is frequently used. Its therapeutic utility has been established, but more extensive real-world evidence is needed to confirm its pain-relieving and joint-improving efficacy. Methods: About 25 patients with verified meniscus tears were included in this retrospective cohort analysis, in which we analysed the results and complications of arthroscopic meniscectomy. Data on patients’ demographics, preoperative symptoms, surgical procedures, intraoperative results, and aftercare were compiled and analysed. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to evaluate the success rates regarding pain reduction and improved joint function, functional recovery, and complications. Results: High rates of success after arthroscopic meniscectomy were found in the study, which is encouraging. Eighty-five per cent of patients reported decreased pain, and 78 per cent said enhanced joint mobility. And 70% of people returned to doing all they did before their injuries. Average KOOS scores rose by 24 points. Postoperative pain was reported in 10% of patients, minor joint stiffness in 7.2%, and one occurrence of more profound vein thrombosis in 0.4%. Conclusion: Clinical evidence supports the use of arthroscopic meniscectomy to treat meniscus tears, which results in decreased discomfort and enhanced joint function. These results indicate that it should be used indefinitely as a therapeutic measure. Complications highlight the significance of cautious selection of patients and surgical procedures. This study adds to the body of evidence from real-world settings, supporting the clinical efficacy of the technique while also stressing the need for continuous research to improve patient outcomes further.

Keywords

Arthroscopic Meniscectomy, Complications, Knee Joint Function, Meniscus Tears, Outcome Assessment.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities