
In this report, we highlight science communication practices across different academic contexts. The aim is to provide a snapshot of what the researchers actually do when sharing their research results with their peers and also wider lay audiences and to share these good practices. We will also investigate the barriers encountered in the process of sharing research results and in the uptake of digital genres and make recommendations for enhancing researchers’ ability to communicate with diversified audiences. Report compiled by P3 University of Bordeaux members
DILAN
DILAN
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
