Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

RNAseq of Mus musculus lung tissue

NF-CORE/rnaseq pipeline outputs
Authors: Perdijk, Olaf; Macowan, Matthew;

RNAseq of Mus musculus lung tissue

Abstract

RNAseq was performed on mouse lung tissue samples to assess the effects of antibiotic treatment on airway gene transcriptional programs. The effect of antibiotics treatment was primarily investigated in conjunction with the age of treatment onset, with some mice starting treatment at 3-weeks of old (young) while others started at 8-weeks old (old). Secondly, comparisons were made following cohousing of the mice (to normalise the gut microbiome) following their course of antibiotics. These experiments are referred to as "Abx-treated" and "Cohoused" in the accompanying metadata file. The RNA sequencing raw fastq files have been processed using the NF-CORE rnaseq pipeline. Briefly, reads undergo initial QC with FastQC, UMIs are extracted with UMI-tools, and reads undergo adapter removal and quality trimming using Trim Galore! Next, genomic contaminants are removed via BBSplit, and ribosomal components are removed via SortMeRNA. Reads are aligned and quantified via a combination of STAR and Salmon tools, and sorted and indexed using SAMtools and dereplicated via UMI-tools. Outputs are provided in .rds file format as SummarizedExperiment objects, with bias-corrected gene counts without an offset (perdijk_abx_study_2024_RNA.gene_counts_length_scaled.rds). A .csv file of the corrected counts table has also been provided (perdijk_abx_study_2024_RNA.gene_counts_length_scaled.csv). There are two matrices provided in the .rds file: counts and abundance. The abundance matrix is the scaled and normalised transcripts per million (TPM) abundance. TPM explicitly erases information about library size. That is, it estimates the relative abundance of each transcript proportional to the total population of transcripts sampled in the experiment. Thus, you can imagine TPM, in a way, as a partition of unity — we want to assign a fraction of the total expression (whatever that may be) to transcript, regardless of whether our library is 10M fragments or 100M fragments. The counts matrix is a re-estimated counts table that aims to provide count-level data to be compatible with downstream tools such as DESeq2. The tximport package has a single function for importing transcript-level estimates. The type argument is used to specify what software was used for estimation. A simple list with matrices, "abundance", "counts", and "length", is returned, where the transcript level information is summarized to the gene-level. Typically, abundance is provided by the quantification tools as TPM (transcripts-per-million), while the counts are estimated counts (possibly fractional), and the "length" matrix contains the effective gene lengths. The "length" matrix can be used to generate an offset matrix for downstream gene-level differential analysis of count matrices.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average