Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Analysis of Factors that Contribute to Unsuccessful Completion of Construction Projects in Public Learning Institutions: The Case of Baringo County, Kenya

Authors: Hosea, Kibet Cherono; Kyalo, Muthoka Ndunda; Kerre, Bonaventure W.;

Analysis of Factors that Contribute to Unsuccessful Completion of Construction Projects in Public Learning Institutions: The Case of Baringo County, Kenya

Abstract

ABSTRACT The proportion of construction works in public learning institutions in Kenya that are unsuccessfully completed is 30 percent. A construction project is unsuccessfully completed if it suffers time and cost overruns and is of poor quality. This study aims to determine how some known factors contribute to the unsuccessful completion of works in public learning institutes in Baringo County. Multistage random sampling was applied. The data was qualitative and was collected through a self-administered questionnaire-based survey and analyzed by descriptive analysis and multivariate regression. The level of covariance of the three dependent variables (timeliness, quality, and cost of works) was 0.000. Quality and timeliness of works had a weak but statistically significant negative correlation (-0.333). Cost and quality had a moderately positive correlation (0.503). All parameters demonstrated good capacity to explain variations of all three dependent variables with unstandardized beta coefficients of 0.250, except in the circumstances outlined below. Regarding the relationship between cost and quality when the project is faced with financing challenges, the t value was -0.499, which is outside the area of acceptance at a 95 confidence level. The observed power was 0.076, and the level of significance was 0.624. Regarding the relationship between cost and timeliness of works when the project is faced with procurement challenges, the significance value was 0.176 and the t value was 1.084. Regarding the relationship between quality and cost of works when the project is faced with planning challenges, the t statistic measured 0.547, the significance statistic was 0.591, and the observed explanatory power was 0.081. All the above statistics fell outside the margin of acceptance. Unsuccessful completion of construction works is rampant in Kenya’s public learning institutions because quality maximization, cost minimization, and timeliness of works cannot be attained concurrently. To maximize quality, the financing agent (NG-CDF) must forego cost minimization. The procurement team must forego cost minimization to realize timeliness. The planning team must forego quality maximization to minimize costs. It is necessary to evaluate the same research questions on a wider scale. Keywords: Cost minimization; Quality maximization; Timeliness of works; Unsuccessful completion

Related Organizations
Keywords

Unsuccessful completion, Timeliness of works, Cost minimization, Quality maximization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities