Metadata Desiderata for Literary Corpora: A survey for starting a conversation between literary studies, libraries and research data repositories.
Calvo Tello, José; Rißler-Pipka, Nanette; Chambers, Sally; Genêt, Philippe; Helling, Patrick;
Metadata Desiderata for Literary Corpora: A survey for starting a conversation between literary studies, libraries and research data repositories.
The poster presents the highlights of the results of a survey on the categories that literary scholars find most important when composing literary corpora or collections. The survey was carried out by the German NFDI consortium Text+, the DFG priority program (SPP 2207) Computational Literary Studies and the European project CLS Infra. All projects are strongly linked to both, literary studies and research infrastructures.
- University of Cologne Germany
- Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen Germany
- Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Germany
- Max Weber Foundation International Humanities Germany
- Ghent University Belgium
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP! 0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities