Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Rise of AI-Powered Writing: How ChatGPT is Revolutionizing Scientific Communication - For Better or For Worse [preprint]

Authors: Pawlicka, Aleksandra; Pawlicki, Marek; Kozik, Rafał; Choraś, Michał;

The Rise of AI-Powered Writing: How ChatGPT is Revolutionizing Scientific Communication - For Better or For Worse [preprint]

Abstract

With the emergence of advanced artificial intelligence technologies, the use of ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) has gained significant attention in the scientific writing community. ChatGPT is a machine learning algorithm that has the capability to generate text that resembles human writing. This article provides a comprehensive review of the advantages, threats, and mitigation strategies of applying ChatGPT to scientific writing. While ChatGPT presents a range of benefits for scientific writing, it also poses potential threats to the integrity and accuracy of scientific content. To address this issue, a study was conducted to test whether current AI detectors are able to reliably detect the use of ChatGPT in academic writing. The outcomes raise pertinent questions regarding the ways one can ensure the credibility and integrity of academic writing in the era of AI. --- Disclaimer: This is a preprint version of the article. The content here is for view-only purposes. This is not the final published version and may differ from the version of record. Please refer to the official version for citation and authoritative use.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by