Curation of dataset publication is support, not just about control

The main aim of a review phase in repositories is typically to have some quality control on the FAIRness of the data. However, just as important is how you can ensure that researchers are fully informed and supported in their efforts to publish their data. By automating part of the quality control, we can focus more on our support efforts.

Related Organizations

KU Leuven
Belgium

Keywords

Work on automating curation processes, review, rdm support, curation, Building trust and transparency into research and curation techniques, costs, and workflows, automation

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average