Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Improved Juvenile Spittlebugs Populations Quantitative Sampling

Authors: D'Accolti, Angela; Picciotti, Ugo; Schiavarelli, Angela; Gammino, Riccardo, Pio; Salerno, Martina; Diana, Francesco; Diana, Laura; +2 Authors

Improved Juvenile Spittlebugs Populations Quantitative Sampling

Abstract

Spittlebugs (Hemiptera Aphrophoridae) have been rising celebrity as one of the most representative species, Philaenus spumarius Linnaeus, 1758, shown to be the vector of Xylella fastidiosa pauca in the Apulian OQDS epidemics. The juvenile vector population size knowledge is one of the crucial data in establishing an effective control strategy while choosing action thresholds, tuning control action intensity and estimating control efficacy. The first experience on spittle quantitative sampling by direct in-field scrutiny revealed the approach to be very expensive regarding needed time and workforce. Moreover, population size gathered data showed not to be congruous among the fifth pre-imaginal instars. Divergence in observation being possibly due to the small size of the early juvenile instar, the spittle inconsistency and the inherent difficulty to collect them all from a herb volume that can grow as 0.5-0.8 m3/m2. To quantify at our best the spittlebug juvenile population size and to compare conventional and innovative sampling methods, we realised conventional and innovative spittle sampling on two side by side homogenous Sub-Sampling Units. A five-person squad sampled weekly from February to May 2017 in three different field management models: uncultivated, no-tillage and conventional tillage olive orchards. The squad sampled a total 4,5 m2 exploring one management per day/week and scrutinizing 18 random Sub-Sampling Units (SSU=transect) of 0,25 m2 (0,25 m * 1 m) each. Namely 16 SSU by conventional and 2 by innovative technique. Both conventional and innovative sampling were destructive, contrary to the EFSA-funded field surveys that are conservative, which implicated the field collection of most or all of the plants framed by the transect. For conventional sampling, collected plants were scrutinised in the lab by the naked eye, lighted magnifying glass or loupe or stereoscope counting juveniles and storing them in 75% EtOH. In case of conventional sampling, each SSU required about 80 minutes of worktime. The innovative sampling method consists in a triple sequential rinsing of collected plant in saline solution. The washing dissolves the spittle and pick up from the plants accurately and safely the juveniles, that dive into the saline. As plant removal is complete, the saline is filtered through a non-woven piece of fabric to collect juveniles that rest alive on the tissue. This innovative technique, we call AquaSamPling (ASP), as well as reducing overall worktime, requiring 45 minutes per SSU, has proven to be 20-50% more effective in term of collected juveniles than the conventional one.

Related Organizations
Keywords

xylem-sap feeders, xylematic bacteria, vector control, alien invasive pest, plant disease, Mediterranean, CoDiRO

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 2
  • 3
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
2
Green