<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

20230120-MTOA: Carrying fewer tasks does not affect the accuracy of resource-restricted agents but improves the prosperity and equitability of agent societies.

Name: 20230120-MTOA: Carrying fewer tasks does not affect the accuracy of resource-restricted agents but improves the prosperity and equitability of agent societies.
Creator: Kalaitzakis, Andreas
Keywords: Cultural Evolution, Multi-agent Simulation

Research datakeyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 20 Jan 2023 English Publisher:Zenodo

Authors: Kalaitzakis, Andreas;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11175994 , 10.5281/zenodo.11175995

20230120-MTOA: Carrying fewer tasks does not affect the accuracy of resource-restricted agents but improves the prosperity and equitability of agent societies.

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This archive contains the results of a multi-agent simulation experiment [1] carried out with Lazy lavender [2] environment.Experiment Label: 202300120-MTOAExperiment design: Agents specialize through expressing their preferences.Experiment setting: Agents are trained with respect to different tasks and then coordinate upon acting on them. Each time they disagree, one agent adapts its knowledge with respect to the current task.Hypotheses: The higher is the number of carried out tasks, the higher the average accuracy is.Detailed information can be found in index.html or notebook.ipynb.[1] https://sake.re/20230120-MTOA[2] https://gitlab.inria.fr/moex/lazylav/

Keywords

Cultural Evolution, Multi-agent Simulation

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average