
Objective To analyze the psychometric performance of Meaning in Life Questionnaire Chinese Version (C-MLQ) for the elderly in Guangdong Province, China. Methods A stratified random sampling was used to select 1109 old people from 5 cities in Guangdong province, and C-MLQ was used to investigate them. The floor and ceiling effects were used to analyze the sensitivity of C-MLQ. And then, Cronbach's α coefficient was used to analyze the internal consistency of the questionnaire, and Convergent validity, discriminant validity and factor analysis were used to evaluate its structural validity. Finally, the total score of the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-15) was used as the calibration criterion to verify the simultaneity calibration validity of C-MLQ. Results The total score and the scores of two dimensions of life meaning experience (LME) and life meaning pursuit (LMP) were governed by the normal distribution, without any floor or celling effect. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.810, and the Cronbach's α coefficients of LME and LMP were 0.739 and 0.775 respectively, which met with the requirements of the group comparison. The calibration success rates of convergent and discriminant validity of LME and LMP were all 100%. Two components obtained from factor analysis, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 51.261%, which were basically consistent with the theoretical conception of C-MLQ. The total score of C-MLQ was significantly negatively correlated with the total score of GDS-15 (β=- 0.323, P<0.001), only score of LMP in two dimensions significantly negatively predicted the total score of GDS-15 (β=- 0.345, P<0.001).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
