
The burgeoning use of social media raises questions about its evidentiary value in Indian courts. This abstract explores the legal landscape surrounding social media as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act (IEA) and the Information Technology Act (ITA). Drawing on legal scholarship and recent case law, the abstract highlights the key points: · Admissibility: Social media content can be admitted as evidence if properly authenticated under Section 65B of the IEA. This requires a certificate from a person authorized under the ITA. · Recent Case Law: Landmark judgments like "State of Maharashtra vs. Pratik Manoharlal Chaudhari" (2018) and "Shafi Mohammad vs. State (NCT of Delhi)" (2018) clarify the procedures for authentication and expand the scope for using social media evidence. · Methodology: A clear methodology for presenting social media evidence exists: identification, preservation, authentication, relevance assessment, and weight determination.
INDIAN LAW, SOCIAL MEDIA, EVIDENCE
INDIAN LAW, SOCIAL MEDIA, EVIDENCE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
