Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Authors: Lakshmi Deepthi Davuluru;

A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Abstract

Background: For upper limb surgeries, ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block is the preferred technique. Adding adjuvants to peripheral nerve blocks is common to enhance their analgesic effectiveness and duration. In this study, we compared the analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg and clonidine 1µg/kg as adjuvants to a low volume of bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind study was conducted after obtaining permission from the institutional ethics committee. We included 40 ASA grade I and II patients, aged 18 to 60 years, who were scheduled for upper limb orthopedic surgery. Group D (Dexmedetomidine group) received 20 ml of bupivacaine along with dexmedetomidine (10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml). Group C (Clonidine group) received 20 ml of 0.25 bupivacaine along with clonidine (10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1µg/kg of clonidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml) in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Results: The mean age of Group C, receiving bupivacaine with clonidine, had a mean age of 37.5 ± 10.55 years, while Group D, receiving bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine, had a mean age of 35.81 ± 8.55 years. The average time for the onset of sensory block in group C was 12.22 minutes, while in group D, it was 9.55 ± 1.2 minutes. The mean time of onset of motor block in group C was 14.2 ± 1.56 minutes and in group D it was 11.9 ± 0.88 minutes no instances of hypotension or bradycardia were observed in either group. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% has been found to significantly prolong the pain-free period, duration of motor blockade, and sensory blockade when compared to clonidine or the control group. This combination offers the advantage of maintaining hemodynamic stability while keeping the patient calm. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using a low volume of bupivacaine with 1µg/kg dexmedetomidine resulted in adequate blockade and provided effective postoperative analgesia.

Background: For upper limb surgeries, ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block is the preferred technique. Adding adjuvants to peripheral nerve blocks is common to enhance their analgesic effectiveness and duration. In this study, we compared the analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg and clonidine 1µg/kg as adjuvants to a low volume of bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind study was conducted after obtaining permission from the institutional ethics committee. We included 40 ASA grade I and II patients, aged 18 to 60 years, who were scheduled for upper limb orthopedic surgery. Group D (Dexmedetomidine group) received 20 ml of bupivacaine along with dexmedetomidine (10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml). Group C (Clonidine group) received 20 ml of 0.25 bupivacaine along with clonidine (10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1µg/kg of clonidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml) in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Results: The mean age of Group C, receiving bupivacaine with clonidine, had a mean age of 37.5 ± 10.55 years, while Group D, receiving bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine, had a mean age of 35.81 ± 8.55 years. The average time for the onset of sensory block in group C was 12.22 minutes, while in group D, it was 9.55 ± 1.2 minutes. The mean time of onset of motor block in group C was 14.2 ± 1.56 minutes and in group D it was 11.9 ± 0.88 minutes no instances of hypotension or bradycardia were observed in either group. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% has been found to significantly prolong the pain-free period, duration of motor blockade, and sensory blockade when compared to clonidine or the control group. This combination offers the advantage of maintaining hemodynamic stability while keeping the patient calm. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using a low volume of bupivacaine with 1µg/kg dexmedetomidine resulted in adequate blockade and provided effective postoperative analgesia.

Keywords

Adjuvant, Bupivacaine, Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, Clonidine, sensory and motor blockade.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities