{"references": ["Internal Methodology, \"Project Delivery Process\", 2010 \u2013 internal\nproject management methodology.", "Ginger Levin, Parviz F. Rad, 2002, \"The Advanced Project Management\nOffice; A comprehensive Look at Function and Implementation\", CRC\nPress.", "Koelmans, R.G., 2004, \"Project success and performance evaluation\",\nInternational Platinum Conference 'Platinum Adding Value', The South\nAfrican Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.", "Standish 2009 CHAOS Report (which can be found at\nhttp://www1.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php).", "Cleland, D.I., Gareis, R., 2006, \"Global Project Management\nHandbook\", 2nd edition, McGraw Hill.", "Gareis, R., Huemann, M., 2000, \"PM-Competencies in the Projectoriented\nOrganization in: The Gower Handbook of Project\nManagement\", JR Turner, SJ Simister (ed.), Gower, Aldershot.", "Gareis, R., Stummer, M., 2008, \"Processes & Projects\", Manz.", "Pennypacker, J.S., Grant, K.P., 2003, \"Project management maturity: An\nindustry benchmark\", Project Management Journal, 34 (1), 4-11.", "Project Management Institute, 2008, \"A Guide to the Project\nManagement Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 4th edition, PMI,\nNewtown Square.\n[10] Turner, J.R., M\u00fcller, R., 2006, \"Choosing Appropriate Project\nManagers: Matching their Leadership Style to the Type of Project\",\nNewtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute."]}

Success means different things for different people. For us, project managers, it becomes even harder to actually find a definition. Many factors have to be included in the evaluation. Moreover, literature is not very helpful, lacking consensus and neutrality. Post-implementation reviews (PIR) can be an efficient tool in evaluating how things worked on a certain project. Despite the visible progress, PIR is not a very detailed subject yet and there is not common understanding in this matter. This may be the reason that some organizations include it in the projects' lifecycle and some do not. Through this paper, we point out the reasons why all project managers should pay proper attention to this important step and to the elements which can be assessed, beside the already famous triple constraints: cost, budget and time. It is essential to take notice that PIR is not a checklist. It brings the edge in eliminating subjectivity and judging projects based on actual proof. Based on our experience, our success indicator model, presented in this paper, contributes to the success of the project! In the same time, it increases trust among customers who will perceive success more objectively.