Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Outcomes of VAC Therapy and Collagen Granules in the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Authors: Narasimhaiah Lakshmi Prasad; Tasmina Nureen Huma; Md Asad;

Comparative Outcomes of VAC Therapy and Collagen Granules in the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Abstract

Background: Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a common and severe complication of diabetes, requiring effective management strategies. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy and Collagen Granules in the treatment of DFUs. Methods: In this prospective study, 100 patients with DFUs were randomized into two groups: VAC Therapy (n=50) and Collagen Granules (n=50). We evaluated the time to complete wound healing, infection rates, and patient comfort levels. Results: The time to complete healing was significantly shorter in the VAC Therapy group (8.2 weeks, SD ± 2.1) compared to the Collagen Granules group (9.7 weeks, SD ± 2.5) with a p-value of 0.03. The infection rates were 12% for VAC Therapy and 18% for Collagen Granules, not statistically significant (p = 0.30). Patient comfort was significantly higher in the Collagen Granules group (88%) compared to the VAC Therapy group (75%, p = 0.04). Conclusion: VAC Therapy demonstrated a faster healing time for DFUs, while Collagen Granules were favored for patient comfort. The choice of treatment should consider both clinical efficacy and patient preferences. Future studies focusing on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness are needed.

Background: Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a common and severe complication of diabetes, requiring effective management strategies. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy and Collagen Granules in the treatment of DFUs. Methods: In this prospective study, 100 patients with DFUs were randomized into two groups: VAC Therapy (n=50) and Collagen Granules (n=50). We evaluated the time to complete wound healing, infection rates, and patient comfort levels. Results: The time to complete healing was significantly shorter in the VAC Therapy group (8.2 weeks, SD ± 2.1) compared to the Collagen Granules group (9.7 weeks, SD ± 2.5) with a p-value of 0.03. The infection rates were 12% for VAC Therapy and 18% for Collagen Granules, not statistically significant (p = 0.30). Patient comfort was significantly higher in the Collagen Granules group (88%) compared to the VAC Therapy group (75%, p = 0.04). Conclusion: VAC Therapy demonstrated a faster healing time for DFUs, while Collagen Granules were favored for patient comfort. The choice of treatment should consider both clinical efficacy and patient preferences. Future studies focusing on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness are needed.

Keywords

Diabetic Foot Ulcers, VAC Therapy, Collagen Granules, Wound Healing, Patient Comfort

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities