{"references": ["World/National Council of Churches Cast the First Stone, Quezon City,\nPhilippines: National Council of Churches, 1987.", "S.P. Sturdevant and B. Stultzfus, Let the Good Times Roll: Prostitution\nand the U.S. Military in Asia. New York, The Free Press,1992", "C. Gastardo-Conaco and C. I. Sobritchea, Filipino-Amerasians: Living\nin the Margins. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines\nCenter for Women's Studies Foundation and Pearl S. Buck Foundation,\n1999.", "P. C. Kutschera, \"Stigma, psychosocial risk and core mental health\nsymptomatology among Amerasians in the Philippines: A multiple-case\nstudy,\" doctorate dissertation, College of Social and Behavioral\nSciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN USA, 2010, 2011.", "Agence France-Presse. (2015, May 29-June 4), \"US affirms 'ironclad'\npromise to defend the Philippines,\" The Filipino Express, Jersey City,\nNJ, pp. 1, 4.", "P.C. Kutschera, M.A. Caputi and M.G. Talamera-Sandico, \"Filipina\nmilitary Amerasian motherhood: Stigma, stereotypes, truths and\nrealities,\" paper presented at the Asia Pacific Social Sciences\nConference (APSSC-2014), Seoul, South Korea, pp. 1-14, January,\n2014.", "R.S. Levi, \"Legacies of war: The United States' obligation towards\nAmerasians,\" Stanford Journal of International Law, vol. 29, pp. 459-\n502, 1993.", "C. Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Making Feminine Sense of\nInternational Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press,\n1990.", "P.C. Kutschera, M.A. Caputi, J.M.G. Pelayo III, M.G. Talamera-\nSandico, Elena C. Tesoro and P. M. Kutschera, \"Episodic stigma,\npsychosocial risk, and stress confronting second-generation military\nFilipino Amerasians in Central Luzon: A multiple-case study,\" The\nInternational Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, vol. 9, 2015.\n[10] J.H. Ahern, \"Out of sight, out of mind: United States immigration law\nand policy as applied to Filipino-Amerasians,\" Pacific Rim Law &\nPolicy Journal, vol 105, 1992.\n[11] P.C. Kutschera, P.C. and M.A. Caputi, \"The case for categorization of\nmilitary Filipino Amerasians as diaspora,\" paper presented Ninth\nInternational Conference on the Philippines (ICOPHIl-2012), Asian\nStudies Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, October,\n2012.\n[12] C. Enloe, Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarization\nWomen's Lives. Berkeley, CA and London, UK, pp. 68-76, 2000.\n[13] J. G. Raymond. Not a Choice, Not a Job: Exposing the Myths about\nProstitution and the Global Sex Trade. Washington, DC: Potomac\nBooks, pp. 152-156, 2013.\n[14] M. Ralston and E. Keeble, Reluctant Bedfellows: Feminism, Activism\nand Prostitution in the Philippines. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press, pp.\n97-125, 2009.\n[15] P.C. Kutschera and M. G. Talamera-Sandico, \"The derivative family\nconstruct among Filipino Amerasians in Central Luzon,\" symposia paper\npresented at the Forum on Cross-Cultural Identities (Narratives of\nResistance and Adaptation, Asian Center, University of the Philippines-\nDiliman, pp. 3-24, February, 2012.\n[16] M.E.Cattani, \"The Filipino-Amerasians of Olongapo, Philippines:\nIdentity, development and the nation,\" unpublished thesis, Harvard-\nRadcliffe College, Cambridge, MA, 1997.\n[17] P.C. Kutschera and M.G. Talamera-Sandico, \"Somatic illness and\npsychosocial risk among military Amerasian adolescents and young\nadults in Luzon, the Philippines,\" Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work\nand Development, vol.23, no. 3, pp. 183-197, 2013.\n[18] A.E. Fortune and W. J. Reed, Research in Social Work. (3rd Ed.). New\nYork: Columbia University Press, pp. 212-113, 1999.\n[19] G. Falk, Stigma: How We Treat Outsiders. Amherst, NY: Prometheus\nBooks, pp. 267-287, 2001..\n[20] R.K.Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park,\nCA: Sage, 1989.\n[21] J.W. Creswell, Design and Research: Qualitative & Quantitative\nApproaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994, pp. 157-158, 160.\n[22] K. Barry, Female Sexual Slavery. New York: New York University\nPress, pp. 39-50, 1984.\n[23] P.C. Kutschera and E.G.Galang, \"No way out: The tragic transnational\nsexual exploitation of the Philippines,\" paper presented 2nd Asia Pacific\nConference on Business and Social Sciences (APCBSS-2014), Taipei,\nTaiwan, ROC, November, 2014.\n[24] K. Berry, The Prostitution of Sexuality. New York: New York\nUniversity Press, pp.136-158, 1995.\n[25] S. Jeffreys, The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global\nSex Trade. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 86-106, 2009.\n[26] I. Shaw and N. Gould, Qualitative Research in Social Work. Thousand\nOaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 16-22, 2001.\n[27] J. Shade, America's Forgotten Children: The Amerasians. Perkasie, PA:\nThe Pearl S. Buck Foundation, 1980.\n[28] R. McKelvey, Dust of Life: America's Children Abandoned in Vietnam.\nSeattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1999."]}

Second generation military Filipino Amerasians comprise a formidable contemporary segment of the estimated 250,000-plus biracial Amerasians in the Philippines today. Overall, they are a stigmatized and socioeconomically marginalized diaspora; historically, they were abandoned or estranged by U.S. military personnel fathers assigned during the century-long Colonial, Post- World War II and Cold War Era of permanent military basing (1898- 1992). Indeed, U.S. military personnel are assigned in smaller numbers in the Philippines today. This inquiry is an outgrowth of two recent small sample studies. The first surfaced the impact of the U.S. military prostitution system on formation of the 'Derivative Amerasian Family Construct' on first generation Amerasians; a second, qualitative case study suggested the continued effect of the prostitution systems' destructive impetuous on second generation Amerasians. The intent of this current qualitative, multiple-case study was to actively seek out second generation sex industry toilers. The purpose was to focus further on this human phenomenon in the postbasing and post-military prostitution system eras. As background, the former military prostitution apparatus has transformed into a modern dynamic of rampant sex tourism and prostitution nationwide. This is characterized by hotel and resorts offering unrestricted carnal access, urban and provincial brothels (casas), discos, bars and pickup clubs, massage parlors, local barrio karaoke bars and street prostitution. A small case study sample (N = 4) of female and male second generation Amerasians were selected. Sample formation employed a non-probability 'snowball' technique drawing respondents from the notorious Angeles, Metro Manila, Olongapo City 'AMO Amerasian Triangle' where most former U.S. military installations were sited and modern sex tourism thrives. A six-month study and analysis of in-depth interviews of female and male sex laborers, their families and peers revealed a litany of disturbing, and troublesome experiences. Results showed profiles of debilitating human poverty, history of family disorganization, stigmatization, social marginalization and the ghost of the military prostitution system and its harmful legacy on Amerasian family units. Emerging were testimonials of wayward young people ensnared in a maelstrom of deep economic deprivation, familial dysfunction, psychological desperation and societal indifference. The paper recommends that more study is needed and implications of unstudied psychosocial and socioeconomic experiences of distressed younger generations of military Amerasians require specific research. Heretofore apathetic or disengaged U.S. institutions need to confront the issue and formulate activist and solution-oriented social welfare, human services and immigration easement policies and alternatives. These institutions specifically include academic and social science research agencies, corporate foundations, the U.S. Congress, and Departments of State, Defense and Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security (i.e. Citizen and Immigration Services) It is them who continue to endorse a laissez-faire policy of non-involvement over the entire Filipino Amerasian question. Such apathy, the paper concludes, relegates this consequential but neglected blood progeny to the status of humiliating destitution and exploitation. Amerasians; thus, remain entrapped in their former colonial, and neo-colonial habitat. Ironically, they are unwitting victims of a U.S. American homeland that fancies itself geo-politically as a strong and strategic military treaty ally of the Philippines in the Western Pacific.