
Fig. 21. Pultenaea mutabilis var. angusta (= P. sp. Newnes (I. R. Telford 5072 & M. D. Crisp)) line drawing. (a) Habit, (b) flowering branch detail, (c) flower, side view, (d) standard petal, (e) flower, side view, petals removed, (f) wing, (g) keel, (h) ovary detail, (i) calyx, side view, (j) stem detail showing stipule, (k) leaf, abaxial surface, (l) leaf, adaxial surface, (m) leaf surface detail, abaxial, (n) leaf surface detail, adaxial. Scale bar: 26.7 mm (a); 10 mm (b); 8 mm (c–g); 2.7 mm (h, j); 4 mm (i); 5 mm (k, l); 1.6 mm (m, n). All from NSW 1058831, a from dried material, b–m from spirit.
Published as part of Renner, Matthew A. M., Barrett, Russell L., Clarke, Steve, Clugston, James A. R. & Wilson, Peter H. Weston Trevor C., 2022, Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation, pp. 225-277 in Australian Systematic Botany 35 (3) on page 259, DOI: 10.1071/SB21030, http://zenodo.org/record/11048683
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Fabales, Fabaceae, Biodiversity, Pultenaea, Plantae, Taxonomy
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Fabales, Fabaceae, Biodiversity, Pultenaea, Plantae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
