Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Towards real world medical image analysis

Authors: Wu, Fuping; Gao, Shangqi; Zhuang, Xiahai; Ding, Wangbin; Wang, Sihan; Odille, Freddy; Chen, Bailiang; +16 Authors

Towards real world medical image analysis

Abstract

Many foundation models for medical image analysis, such as Segment Anything Model (SAM), have been released and proved to be useful in multiple tasks. However, their effectiveness on real world medical imaging data has not been explored. For example, specific images targeted on organs with large deformation, i.e., heart and liver, exhibit greater challenges for analysis. [challenges]First, the misalignment caused by the respiratory motion and cardiac pulsation increases the complexity of performing joint analysis on these data. Second, the inhomogeneity of real-world medical images poses a challenge, including the diversity of modality and the distribution shift caused by collection from various centers.Third, it could be more challenging for those foundation model to work on irregular ROIs, such as lesions or scars, whose size can be very small and shape irregular. Hence, developing effective and efficient transfer learning approaches to fully utilize those foundation models for real world medical image segmentation is of great values. [our contribution]In this challenge, we set up a fair and public stage for developing and validating algorithms and applications of transferring foundation models to diverse real-world medical images to address specific practical medical image analysis problems, as well as using conventional methods without pre-trained models. [Datasets]Four specific datasets will be released grouped by clinical requirements, targeted on organs with grand large deformation, i.e., heart and liver, and consisting of over 1250 patients from three continents. The diversity of datasets manifests in the following aspects, i.e., multi-continents: collected from over 18 centers across three continents, multi-modality: various modalities are encompassed, misalignment: inherent misalignment exists caused by the respiratory motion and cardiac pulsation, and missing data: refers to the modality missing occurred in practice. [Track]Five tracks will be held in this challenge, including one comprehensive issue and four specific tracks with corresponding images and clinical problems, namely, (1) Transferring Foundation model track, (2) MyoPS ++, (3) LiFS, (4) Whole Heart Segmentation ++, (5) LAScarQS++. Specifically, the first track aims at a uniform TransferringFoundation model for the generality across the other four tracks, namely to address all or partial tasks. The uniform model will undergo comprehensive evaluation, with various metrics being integrated for ranking purposes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Generalizability, Foundation Model, MICCAI 2024 challenges, Whole heart segmentation, Left atrial and scar quantification and segmentation, Myocardium pathology segmentation, Liver fibrosis staging and segmentation, Real-World medical image analysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities