This paper examines how “Zakat” provides fair income redistribution and aids the struggle against poverty. Providing fair income redistribution and combating poverty constitutes some of the fundamental tasks performed by countries all over the world. Each country seeks a solution for these problems according to their political, economic and administrative styles through applying various economic and financial policies. The same situation can be handled via “zakat” association in Islam. Nowadays, we observe different versions of “zakat” in developed countries. Applications such as negative income tax denote merely a different form of “zakat” that is being applied almost in the same way but under changed names. However, the minimum values to donate under zakat (e.g. 85 gr. gold and 40 animals) get altered and various amounts are put into practice. It might be named as negative income tax instead of zakat, nonetheless, these applications are based on the Holy Koran and the hadith released 1400 years ago. Besides, considering the savage and slavery in the world at those times, we might easily recognize the true value of the zakat being applied for the first time then in the Islamic system. Through zakat, governments are able to transfer incomes to the poor as a means of enabling them achieve the minimum standard of living required. With regards to who benefits from the Zakat, an objective and fair criteria was used to determine who benefits from the zakat contrary to the notion that it was based on peoples’ own choices. Since the zakat is obligatory, the transfers do not get forwarded directly but via the government and get distributed, which requires vast governmental organizations. Through the application of Zakat, reduced levels of poverty can be achieved and also ensure the fair income redistribution.

{"references": ["B.S. Nursi, I\u015faratul Icaz, Istanbul, 2013.", "F.F. Senses, Kuresellesmenin Oteki Yuzu Yoksulluk, Istanbul, 2013, p.62.", "J. Drewnosky, \"Poverty: It is Meaning and Measurement\", Development\nand Change, 1997, Vol: 8, Issue 2, pp.183-208.", "E. Thorbecke, \"Conceptual and measurement issues,\" World Institute for\nDevelopment Economics Research, Discussion Paper No. 2004/04,\nFebruary 2004.", "R. Laderchi, R.Saith, and F.Stewart, \"Does it Matter that we do not\nagree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of four approahes\"\nOxford Development Studies Vol.31, No.3. 2003.", "C. Oppenheim, and L Harker, Poverty: The Facts. Child Poverty Action\nGroup Publish.1996.", "O. Arpacioglu and M. Yildirim, Turkiye'de ve Dunyada Yoksullugun\nAnalizi, Nigde Universitesi IIBF Dergisi, Cilt 4, Say\u0131 2, p.60-76.2011.", "A. Sumner,\"Meaning versus Measurement: Why Do Economic\nIndicators of Poverty Still Predominate ?\", Development in Practice,\nVolume 17, Number 1, February 2007.", "L. Baliamoune- and N. Mina, \"On the Measurement of Human Wellbeing\",\nWorld Institute for Development Economics Research, Research\nPaper No. 2004/16.\n[10] S. Anand and A. Sen,\" Concepts of Human Development and Poverty:\nA Multidiscipline Perspective, Ed. F. Parr and S. Kumar and A.K.\nShiva\", Readings in Human Development, pp. 228-244 Oxford\nUniversity Press.\n[11] R. Campbell, L. Stanley, Economics, McGraw-Hill Publiching, Twelfth\nEdition, New York.1993\n[12] A. Ulusoy, Maliye Politikasi, Park Kitap Yayinlari, Istanbul.2012.\n[13] Quran, 2: 43, 275, 276, 277, 278, 280, etc.\n[14] B.S. Nursi, Sozler, Envar Nesriyat, Istanbul, 2013.\n[15] B.S. Nursi, Mektubat, Envar Nesriyat, Istanbul, 2012."]}