Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Paul's enemies did not "see" Trophimus in Jerusalem, they only "planned" that Trophime would be in Jerusalem. In fact, Paul had left him in Miletus where he had fallen ill. This confirms in a surprising way, and even proves: the historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, the authenticity of the Second Letter to Timothy and its writing in Caesarea. Les ennemis de Paul n'ont pas "vu" Trophime à Jérusalem, ils avaient seulement "prévu" que Trophime serait à Jérusalem. En fait, Paul l'avait laissé à Milet où il était tombé malade. Ceci confirme de façon étonnante, et même prouve: la fiabilité historique des Actes des apôtres, l'authenticité de la Deuxième lettre à Timothée, et sa rédaction à Césarée.
Acts of the Apostles, Exegesis, Theology, Textual Criticism, Saint Paul, New Testament Studies
Acts of the Apostles, Exegesis, Theology, Textual Criticism, Saint Paul, New Testament Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts