Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Mojica, I. J., Adams, B., Nagappan, M., Dienst, S., Berger, T., and\nHassan, A. E. \"A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Software Reuse in\nMobile Apps\". IEEE Software, vol. 31, no. 2, pp 78-86, 2014.", "Singh, A. P. and Tomar, P., \"A new model for Reliability Estimation of\nComponent-Based Software\", in Proc. IEEE 3rd International Advance\nComputing Conference (IACC), pp. 1431-1436, Feb. 2013.", "Heinemann, L., Deissenboeck, F., Gleirscher, M., Hummel, B., and\nIrlbeck, M. \"On the extent and nature of software reuse in open source\nJava projects\". In Top productivity through software reuse Springer\nBerlin Heidelberg. pp. 207-222, 2011.", "Sommerville I., Software Engineering, 9th edition, Pearson Education;\n2013. ISBN: 978-9332518858", "Sandhu, P.S., Kakkar, P. and Sharma, S., \"A survey on Software\nReusability\", in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Mechanical and\nElectrical Technology (ICMET), pp.769-773, 2001.", "Sharma, A., Grover, P. S., and Kumar, R., \"Reusability assessment for\nsoftware components\". ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes,\nvol.34, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2009.", "Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I., The unified modeling\nlanguage user guide. Pearson Education India, 2011. ISBN:\n978-81-7758-372-4", "Gill, Nasib S., \"Importance of Software Component Characterization for\nBetter Software Reusability\", ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering\nNotes, vol. 31 No. I, pp. 1-3, 2006.", "Schach, S. R., Object-oriented and classical software engineering, ed. 8.\nMcGraw-Hill, 2011. ISBN: 0071081712, 9780071081719\n[10] Sharma, A., Kumar R. and Grover, P.S., \"A critical Survey of Reusability\nAspects for Component- Based Systems\", World Academy of Science,\nEngineering and Technology, Vol.19, pp. 411-415, 2007.\n[11] Washizaki, H., Yamamoto, H., and Fukazawa, Y., \"A metrics suite for\nmeasuring reusability of software components\", in Proceedings of IEEE\nNinth International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 211-223, 2003.\n[12] Frakes, W.B. and Kyo K., \"Software Reuse Research: Status and Future\",\nIEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 31, issue 7, pp. 529 \u2013 536, 2005.\n[13] Leach, Ronald J. Software Reuse: Methods, Models, Costs. AfterMath,\n2012. ISBN: 0985368519, 9780985368517\n[14] Tomer, A., Goldin, L., Kuflik, T., Kimchi, E., and Schach, S. R.\n\"Evaluating software reuse alternatives: a model and its application to an\nindustrial case study\", IEEE Trans. Software Eng, vol. 30, no 9, pp.\n601-612, 2004.\n[15] Sandhu, P. S., and Singh, H., \"Automatic reusability appraisal of software\ncomponents using neuro-fuzzy approach\", International Journal Of\nInformation Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 209-214, 2006.\n[16] Barns, B. H., and Bollinger, T. B., \"Making reuse cost-effective\", IEEE\nTrans. Software., vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 13-24, 1991.\n[17] Schach S. R. and Yang X., \"Metrics for Targeting Candidates for Reuse:\nAn Experimental Approach\", ACM, SAC, pp 379-383, 1995.\n[18] Boxall, M. A. and Araban, S., \"Interface metrics for reusability analysis\nof components\", in Proceedings of IEEE Australian Software\nEngineering Conference, pp. 40-51, 2004.\n[19] Rotaru, O. P. and Dobre, M., \"Reusability metrics for software\ncomponents\", in 3rd ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer\nSystems and Applications, pp. 24, 2005.\n[20] Kumar, A., \"Measuring Software Reusability using SVM based Classifier\nApproach\". International Journal of Information Technology and\nKnowledge Management, vol. 5 no. 1, pp. 205-209, 2012.\n[21] Gui, G. and Scott, P. D., \"Coupling and cohesion measures for evaluation\nof component reusability\", in Proceedings of ACM International\nworkshop on Mining software repositories, pp. 18-21, 2006.\n[22] Gill, N. S., \"Reusability issues in component-based development\", ACM\nSIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 28 no. 6, pp. 30, 2003.\n[23] IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard\nglossaries. IEEE Press, 1991.\n[24] Yingmei, L., Jingbo, and S., Weining, X., \"On Reusability Metric Model\nfor Software Component\", in: Wu, Y. (eds.) Software Engineering and\nKnowledge Engineering. LNCS, Vol. 114, pp. 865-870. Springer,\nHeidelberg, 2012.\n[25] Koteska, B. and Velinov, G., \"Component-Based Development: A\nUnified Model of Reusability Metrics\", in ICT Innovations, pp. 335-344.\nSpringer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.\n[26] ISO/IEC 9126: Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality\nmodel. International Organization for Standardization and International\nElectrotechnical Commission, 2001.\n[27] Gao, J., \"Component Testability and Component Testing Challenges\", in\nProceedings of International Workshop on Component-based Software\nEngineering (ICSE2000), 2000.\n[28] Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Mathur, A. P. and Trivedi, K. S., \"Comparison\nof architecture-based software reliability models\", in Proceedings of\nIEEE 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering\n(ISSRE2001). pp. 22-31, 2001.\n[29] Apache Commons FileUpload library (online),\n(http://commons.apache.org/fileupload/)\n[30] Codenvy integrated development environment (https://codenvy.com/ide)"]}
Software reusability is an essential characteristic of Component-Based Software (CBS). The component reusability is an important assess for the effective reuse of components in CBS. The attributes of reusability proposed by various researchers are studied and four of them are identified as potential factors affecting reusability. This paper proposes metric for reusability estimation of black-box software component along with metrics for Interface Complexity, Understandability, Customizability and Reliability. An experiment is performed for estimation of reusability through a case study on a sample web application using a real world component.
component reusability, reliability, Component-based software, interface complexity, customizability, understandability.
component reusability, reliability, Component-based software, interface complexity, customizability, understandability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts