Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2672762 , 10.5281/zenodo.2829478 , 10.5281/zenodo.2841575 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666025 , 10.5281/zenodo.2832173 , 10.5281/zenodo.2826555 , 10.5281/zenodo.1096756 , 10.5281/zenodo.2863815 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665031 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665032 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666024 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664080 , 10.5281/zenodo.2829479 , 10.5281/zenodo.2863816 , 10.5281/zenodo.2841574 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664079 , 10.5281/zenodo.2667020 , 10.5281/zenodo.1096757 , 10.5281/zenodo.2815468 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672761 , 10.5281/zenodo.2826554 , 10.5281/zenodo.2815467 , 10.5281/zenodo.2667021 , 10.5281/zenodo.2832172
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2672762 , 10.5281/zenodo.2829478 , 10.5281/zenodo.2841575 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666025 , 10.5281/zenodo.2832173 , 10.5281/zenodo.2826555 , 10.5281/zenodo.1096756 , 10.5281/zenodo.2863815 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665031 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665032 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666024 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664080 , 10.5281/zenodo.2829479 , 10.5281/zenodo.2863816 , 10.5281/zenodo.2841574 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664079 , 10.5281/zenodo.2667020 , 10.5281/zenodo.1096757 , 10.5281/zenodo.2815468 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672761 , 10.5281/zenodo.2826554 , 10.5281/zenodo.2815467 , 10.5281/zenodo.2667021 , 10.5281/zenodo.2832172
{"references": ["A. Celayir, S. Sander, and Celayir, S. \"Accuracy of references in the\npediatric surgery journals,\" Journals of pediatrsurgery,vol. 38, no. 4,\n2003, pp. 653-654.", "J. T. Evans, H. I. Nadjari, and S. A. Burchell, \"Quotational and reference\naccuracy in surgical journals: a continuing peer review problem,\"\nJAMA, vol. 263, no. 10, 1990, pp. 1353-1354.", "G. J. Faunce, and J. R. Soames, \"The accuracy of reference lists in five\nexperimental psychology journals,\" American Psychologist, vol. 56, no.\n10, 2011, pp. 829.", "E. Francese, Reference Management software as digital libraries: a\nsurvey at the university of Torino, 2012.", "M. Fitzgibbons, and D. Meert, \"Are bibliographic management software\nsearch interfaces reliable ?: A comparison between search results\nobtained using database interfaces and the EndNote online search\nfunction, \" The Journal of Academic Librariansip, vol. 36, no. 2, 2010,\npp. 144-150.", "R. Gatten, \"A case study in reference list accuracy,\" New Library\nWorld, 111(1/2), 2010, pp. 16-25.", "J. M. Garfield, H. Flanagan, and J. Fox, \"A comparison of two\nmicrocomputer-based programs for bibliographic retrieval and\nformatting,\" J Clin Monit, 5, 1989, pp.177-185.", "M. K. Hensley, \"Citation management software features and futures,\"\nReference & User Services Quarterly, n. d, pp. 204-208.", "P. Hernon, and C. Metoyer-Duran, Literature reviews and inaccurate\nreferencing : an exploratory study of academic librarians, College and\nresearch libraries, vol. 53, no. 6, 1992, pp. 499-512.\n[10] A. F. Jennings, \"RefWorks and Easybib.com: A comparison of the basic\nfeatures of two electronic citation formatting products,\" The Charleston\nAdvisor, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, 18-21.\n[11] R. Gilmour, L. Cobus-Kuo, \"Reference management software: a\ncomparative analysis of four products,\" Issues Science and Technology\nLibrarianship, 66, 2011, Doi: 10.5062/F4Z60KZF.\n[12] M. Reddy, S. Srinivas, N. Sabanayagam, and S. Balasubramanian,\n\"Accuracy of references in general surgical journals-an old problem\nrevisited, \"The Surgeon, vol. 6, no.2, 2008, pp. 71-75.\n[13] T. L. Mead, and D. R. Berryman, \"Reference and PDF-manager\nsoftware: Complexities, support, and workflow,\" Medical Reference\nServices Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, 2010, pp. 388-393,\nDoi :10.1080/02763869.2010.518928.\n[14] A. E. Mohammad, and D. M. Laskin, (2008). \"Citation accuracy in the\noral and maxillofacial surgery literature,\" Journal of Oral and\nMaxillofacila Surgery, vol. 66, no. 1, 2008, pp. 3-6.\n[15] J. Nashelsky, and D. Earley, \"Reference management software: selection\nand uses,\" Library Software Review, 10, 1991, pp.174-178.\n[16] L. G. O'Connor, and C. Kristof, \"Verify your citations: accuracy of\nreference citations in twelve business and economics journals,\" Journal\nof Business and Finance Librarianship, vol. 6, no. 4, 2001, pp. 23-40.\n[17] M. Oermann, and L. Ziolkowski, \"Accuracy of references in three\ncritical care nursing journals,\" Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, vol.\n17, no. 2, 2002, pp. 78-83.\n[18] M. Oermann, S. Cummings, and N. Wilmes, \"Accuracy of references in\nfour pediatric nursing journals,\" Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 16, 2001,\npp. 263-268.\n[19] M. Oermann, N. Wilmes, and P. Braski, Reference accuracy in neonatalmaternal\nnursing literature. Neonatal Network, vol. 21, no. 1, 2002, pp.\n23-26.\n[20] W. Orlin, J. Pehling, and M. A. Pogrel, \"Do authors check their\nreferences? A survey of 5000 references from the journal of oral and\nmaxilla facial surgery,\" Journal of Oral and Maxillo facial Surgery, vol.\n54, no. 2, 1996, pp. 200-202.\n[21] D. Rapp, Reference management tools, 2011.\n[22] U. Senarath, \"Bibliographic reference made easy: use of bibliographic\nsoftware in health research,\" Ceylon Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 1,\n2007, pp. 38-39.\n[23] R. Siebers, and S. Holt, \"Accuracy of references in five leading medical\njournals,\" Lancet, 356, 2000, pp.1445.\n[24] S. E. Steele, \"Bibliographic citation management software as a tool for\nbuilding knowledge,\" Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence\nNursing, vol. 35, no. 5, 2008, pp. 463-468. [25] N. Tomaiuolo, \"Citations and aberrations,\" Searcher, vol. 15 no. 7,\n2007, pp. 17-24.\n[26] R. Wachtel, \"Personal bibliographic databases,\" Science, 235, 1987,\npp.1093-1096.\n[27] Zotero Blog (2011), Zotero apps go mobile, available at:\nwww.zotero.org/blog/zotero-apps-go-mobile/ (accessed 3 January 2012).\nCited in W. Marino, Fore-cite: tactics for evaluating citation\nmanagement tools, vol. 40, no. 2, 2012, pp. 295-310.\n[28] Zotero, Zotero quick start guide, n. d. available at:\nwww.zotero.org/support/quick_start_guide accessed 20 December\n2012). Cited in J. Emanuel, Users and citation management tools: use\nand support, vol. 41, no. 4, 2013, pp. 639-659.\n[29] M. Fitzgibbons, and D. Meert, \"Are bibliographic management software\nsearch interfaces reliable?: A comparison between search results\nobtained using database interfaces and the EndNote online search\nfunction, \" The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 36, no. 2, 2010,\npp. 144-150.\n[30] P. Gupta, M. Yadav, A. Mohta, and P. Choudhury, \"References in\nIndian pediatrics: authors need to be accurate,\" Indian Pediatr, 42, 2005,\n140-145.\n[31] P. Eichorn, and A. Yankauer, \"Do authors check their references? A\nsurvey of accuracy of references in three public health journals,\"\nAmerican Journal Public Health, 77, 1987, pp. 1011-1012.\n[32] A. Vargas-Origel, G. Gomez-Martinez, and M. A. Vargas-Nieto, \"The\naccuracy of references in paediatric journals,\" Arch Dis Child, 85, 2001,\npp. 497-498.\n[33] M. Curry, and J. Gray, \"BibPort: Creating bibliographic references,\" Dr\nDOBBS Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, 2008, 30.\n[34] F. Brahmi, and C. Gall, \"EndNote and research manager citation formats\ncompared to instructions to authors in top medical journals,\" Medical\nReference Services Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, 2006, pp. 49-57.\n[35] M. Shapland, \"Evaluation of reference management software on NT\n(comparing Papyrus with Procite, Reference Manager, EndNote,\nCitation, Getaref, Biblioscape, Library Master, Bibliographic, Scribe,\nRefs) University of Bristol, (Accessed at\nhttp://eis.bris.ac.uk/~ccms/meval99.htm).\n[36] B. Eapen, \"EndNote,\" Indian Journal of Darmatology Venereology and\nLeprology, 72, pp. 165-166."]}
This paper presents a comparison of reference management software between RefWorks and Zotero. The results were drawn by comparing two software and the novelty of this paper is the comparative analysis of software and it has shown that ReftWorks can import more information from the Google Scholar for the researchers. This finding could help to know researchers to use the reference management software.
comparative analysis, reference management software, researchers., Analysis
comparative analysis, reference management software, researchers., Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts