Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["R.Clough, and S.Johnston, \"Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake\nductility requirements\", Transactions of Japan Earthquake Engineering\nSymposium, pp. 195-198, 1966.", "S.Otani, \"Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures\", Journal of\nStructural Engineering ASCE, vol. 100, no. ST7, pp. 1433-1449, 1974.", "C.Meyer, M.S.Roufaiel, and S.G.Arzoumanidis, \"Analysis of damaged\nconcrete frames for cyclic loads\", Earthquake Engineering and Structural\nDynamics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 207-228, 1983.", "E.Spacone, F.C.Filippou, and F.F. Taucer, \"Fibre beam-column model\nfor nonlinear analysis of R/C frames: Part I. formulation\", Earthquake\nEngineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 25, pp. 711-725, 1996.", "C.G. Cho, G.J.Ha, and Y.Y.Kim, \"Nonlinear Model of Reinforced\nConcrete Frames Retrofitted by In-filled HPFRCC Walls,\" Structural\nEngineering and Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 211-223, 2008.", "J.Schlaich,K. Schaefer, and M.Jennewein, \"Towards a Consistent Design\nof Structural Concrete.\" Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute,\nvol. 32, pp. 74-150, 1987.", "Y. M. Yun, \"Nonlinear strut-tie model approach for structural\nconcrete,\"American Concrete Institute Structure Journal, vol. 97, no. 4,\npp. 581-590, 2000.", "T. N. Tjhin, and D. A. Kuchma, \"Computer-Based Tools for Design by\nStrut-and-Tie Method: Advances and Challenges.\" ACI Structural\nJournal, vol. 99, no. 5, pp.586-594, 2002.", "E. Schlangen, and J. G. M. van Mier, \"Shear fracture in cementitious\ncomposites, Part II: Numerical simulations, in: Z.P. Baz\u02c7ant (Ed.),\"\nFracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (Proc., FraMCoS-1),\nElsevier, London, pp. 671-676, 1992.\n[10] J.G.M.VanMier, A.Vervuurt, and E.Schlangen, \"Boundary and size\neffects in uniaxial tensile tests: a numerical and experimental study\",\nFracture and Damage of Quasibrittle Structures, E&FN Spon,\nLondon/New York, pp. 289\u2013302, 1994.\n[11] G.Lilliu, and J.G.M.vanMier, \"3D Lattice type fracture model for\nconcrete\", Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 70, no. 7/8, pp.\n927-942, 2003.\n[12] T. Miki, \"Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures\nSubjected to Seismic Loads by Using Three-dimensional Lattice Model\",\nPh. D. Thesis, Department of Civil Eng., Tokyo Institute of Technology,\nTokyo, 2004.\n[13] T. Miki, and J. Niwa, \"Nonlinear Analysis of RC Structural Members\nUsing 3-D Lattice Model\", Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology,\nvol.2, no.3, pp.343-358, 2004.\n[14] J.Niwa, \"Equation for Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Deep\nBeams Based on FEM Analysis,\" Concrete Library of JSCE, No.4,\npp.283-295, 1984.\n[15] J. Niwa, I. K. Choi, and T. Tanabe, \"Analytical Study on Shear Resisting\nMechanism of Reinforced Concrete Beams,\" J. of Materials, Concrete\nStructures, Pavement, JSCE, vol. 26, no. 508, pp.79-88, 1995.\n[16] M. H. MohdYassin, \"Nonlinear Analysis of Prestressed Concrete\nStructures under Monotonic and Cyclic Loads,\" Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of\nCivil Eng., UC, Berkeley, 1994.\n[17] D. C.Kent, and R.Park, \"Flexural Members with Confined Concrete,\"\nJournal of Structure Eng., ASCE, vol. 97, no. ST7, pp. 1969-1990, 1971.\n[18] I. D.Karsan, and J. O. Jirsa, \"Behavior of Concrete under Compressive\nLoadings,\" Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, vol. 95, no. ST12, pp.\n2543-2563, 1969.\n[19] S. A. Sheikh, and S. M. Uzumeri, \"Analytical Model for Concrete\nConfinement in Tied Columns,\" J. Struct., Div., ASCE, vol. 108, no.\nST12, pp. 2703-2722, 1982.\n[20] G. Monti, and C. Nuti, \"Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars\nincluding buckling,\"Journal of structural engineering, vol. 188, no. 12,\npp. 3268-3284, 1992.\n[21] American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced\nConcrete (ACI 318). Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2012.\n[22] X.N.Peng, and Y.L. Wong, \"Behavior of reinforced concrete walls\nsubjected to monotonic pure torsion-An experimental study\",\nEngineering Structural, vol.33, no.9, pp.2495-2508, 2011."]}
Seismic design criteria based on performance of structures have recently been adopted by practicing engineers in response to destructive earthquakes. A simple but efficient structural-analysis tool capable of predicting both the strength and ductility is needed to analyze reinforced concrete (RC) structures under such event. A three-dimensional lattice model is developed in this study to analyze torsions in high-strength RC members. Optimization techniques for determining optimal variables in each lattice model are introduced. Pure torsion tests of RC members are performed to validate the proposed model. Correlation studies between the numerical and experimental results confirm that the proposed model is well capable of representing salient features of the experimental results.
Torsion, non-linear analysis, high-strength concrete., three-dimensional lattice
Torsion, non-linear analysis, high-strength concrete., three-dimensional lattice
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts