Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Datasets used in the benchmarking study of MR methods

Authors: Xianghong, Hu;

Datasets used in the benchmarking study of MR methods

Abstract

We conducted a benchmarking analysis of 16 summary-level data-based MR methods for causal inference with five real-world genetic datasets, focusing on three key aspects: type I error control, the accuracy of causal effect estimates, replicability, and power. The datasets used in the MR benchmarking study can be downloaded here: "dataset-GWASATLAS-negativecontrol.zip": the GWASATLAS dataset for evaluation of type I error control in confounding scenario (a): Population stratification "dataset-NealeLab-negativecontrol.zip": the Neale Lab dataset for evaluation of type I error control in confounding scenario (a): Population stratification; "dataset-PanUKBB-negativecontrol.zip": the Pan UKBB dataset for evaluation of type I error control in confounding scenario (a): Population stratification; "dataset-Pleiotropy-negativecontrol": the dataset used for evaluation of type I error control in confounding scenario (b): Pleiotropy; "dataset-familylevelconf-negativecontrol.zip": the dataset used for evaluation of type I error control in confounding scenario (c): Family-level confounders; "dataset_ukb-ukb.zip": the dataset used for evaluation of the accuracy of causal effect estimates; "dataset-LDL-CAD_clumped.zip": the dataset used for evaluation of replicability and power; Each of the datasets contains the following files: "Tested Trait pairs": the exposure-outcome trait pairs to be analyzed; "MRdat" refers to the summary statistics after performing IV selection (p-value < 5e-05) and PLINK LD clumping with a clumping window size of 1000kb and an r^2 threshold of 0.001. "bg_paras" are the estimated background parameters "Omega" and "C" which will be used for MR estimation in MR-APSS. Note: The formatted dataset after quality control can be accessible at our GitHub website (https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/MRbenchmarking). The details on quality control of GWAS summary statistics, formatting GWASs, and LD clumping for IV selection can be found on the MR-APSS software tutorial on the MR-APSS website (https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/MR-APSS). R code for running MR methods is also available at https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/MRbenchmarking.

Keywords

Mendelian Randomization, GWAS, summary statistics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average