
The current reform of the research assessment system focuses on quality and qualitative assessment, and establishes a strong nexus between the two concepts. This article explores the definition of quality proposed in the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA) through an analysis of its principles and core commitments, and suggests that this definition is in line with the definition of Open Science provided in the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Furthermore, a re-reading of The Conflict of the Faculties of Immanuel Kant is proposed to help understand the terms of the definition of Open Science and the link between the latter and research quality from a philosophical-political perspective. Finally, the article introduces a definition of quality in line with the ARRA, emphasising several aspects to be explored in its possible future developments.
Coara, Research assessment, open science, Qualitative judgement, Research quality
Coara, Research assessment, open science, Qualitative judgement, Research quality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
