
Figure 6. Most parsimonious result from a phylogenetic analysis of discrete (1—64) and discretized continuous characters identified through gap coding (88—100). A, strict consensus of 30 most parsimonious trees with equally weighted characters (tree length 346). B, most parsimonious solution with implied weighted characters (k = 3) (tree length 27.86). Psammosteidae taxa in bold (for which quantitative characters have been treated as inapplicable, i.e. non-homologous).
Published as part of Randle, Emma & Sansom, Robert S., 2017, Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters, pp. 583-599 in Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 15 (7) on page 592, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2016.1208293, http://zenodo.org/record/10883180
Lampraspis, Protaspididae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Chordata, Taxonomy, Pteraspidiformes
Lampraspis, Protaspididae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Chordata, Taxonomy, Pteraspidiformes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
